Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leadership, Compelling Mission Keep Air Force Strength High (+) Happy Birthday, USAF
DoD-AFPS ^ | September 18, 2004 | Donna Miles, Gen. Richard B. Myers

Posted on 09/18/2004 7:19:39 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl

American Forces Press Service


Leadership, Compelling Mission Keep Air Force Strength High

By Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Sept. 17, 2004 -- Air Force leadership is struggling with a problem as the service celebrates its 57th birthday Sept. 18.

The Air Force has 20,000 more people than it's authorized. And as the service works to pare its numbers by 16,000 by the end of fiscal 2005, airmen and would-be airmen are standing in line to re-enlist or enlist.

"It's a fascinating problem for us," Air Force Secretary James G. Roche said during a joint interview with the Pentagon Channel and the American Forces Press Service. "Where people might think that because we are at war, we might be having difficulty with recruiting and retention, we have the opposite problem."

Roche said he and other Air Force leaders "have to pinch ourselves" as they acknowledge the service's attraction to current and would-be airmen. "Our airmen are staying more than they have in the past, pilots are returning, and our recruiting numbers are so high that we are having to throttle it back in terms of not allowing as many to come on active duty," he said.

New recruits are increasingly being channeled into "stressed" career fields, those high-demand specialties that need more manpower, Roche said.

The Air Force's numbers problem boils down to the fact that the service has strong leaders who create a situation in which "airmen don't want to leave," the secretary said.

"I'm dealing with a problem, but I keep laughing because I am terribly proud of our airmen and the leadership of our first sergeants and our sergeants and our chiefs and our officers."

Compounding the situation, he said, is a strong emphasis on quality of life for airmen and their families -- from improved housing, to higher pay, to better education and family-support programs.

But Roche said he believes one of the most compelling reasons for joining and staying in the Air Force is the opportunity to play a meaningful role in the war on terror.

"One of the greatest motivating things for human beings is to recognize that others depend on him or her and that he or she is terribly, terribly important," Roche said. He said deploying to forward positions in the terror war -- something more airmen are doing in the Air Expeditionary Force -- drives home the point that "they are doing something very special for their country."

Airmen "feel very good about that -- and they should," Roche said. "It makes them walk a little taller wherever they are."

Biography:
Air Force Secretary James G. Roche



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airforce; airmen; happybirthday; jamesroche; usaf
American Forces Press Service


Chairman's Birthday Message to the U.S. Air Force

Special to American Forces Press Service

On the 18th of September, 1947, our Nation created the United States Air Force. Over the last 57 years, the Air Force has changed dramatically, employing new technology and responding to a changing world. Today, we plan and fight as a Joint and Total Force, and the US Air Force is performing all of its missions superbly, from patrolling the skies of America, airlifting supplies to Afghanistan and fighting in Iraq.

The War on Terrorism is a war we must win, to preserve our freedoms and protect our way of life. The U.S. Air Force has a crucial role in this war, accomplishing vital expeditionary and long range combat missions, along with dozens of other missions critical to our national security: flying satellites, controlling airfields, maintaining our ballistic missile fleet, training technicians and leaders, and many more. Preserving our liberties takes determination, hard work and talent. The task is huge, but I stand completely confident that America's Airmen are up to the challenge.

Today's Air Force inherits a tremendous legacy: a century of flight and a history of boundless accomplishments. That legacy is in very good hands. On behalf of the Joint Chiefs, to all the men and women in the United States Air Force who serve, and have served, I thank you. Happy Birthday, U.S. Air Force!

Sincerely,

Gen. Richard B. Myers, USAF


1 posted on 09/18/2004 7:19:39 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4; TEXOKIE; xzins; Alamo-Girl; blackie; SandRat; Calpernia; SAMWolf; prairiebreeze; ..

.....as the service works to pare its numbers by 16,000 by the end of fiscal 2005, airmen and would-be airmen are standing in line to re-enlist or enlist.

The Air Force's numbers problem boils down to the fact that the service has strong leaders who create a situation in which "airmen don't want to leave," the secretary said.

"I'm dealing with a problem, but I keep laughing because I am terribly proud of our airmen and the leadership of our first sergeants and our sergeants and our chiefs and our officers."

 
~*~
                  
                 Air Force Logo; Past and Present
 
~Happy Birthday, USAF - ping! ------------------   Q

2 posted on 09/18/2004 7:21:52 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (SBCT (+ other allied military) news help wanted. (ping / post / bump) (Freepmail.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl

Hey General. Want to reduce your force size, pass the AC130 and A10 aircraft to the Army. Let the Air Force focus on what it enjoys most, high tech high speed aircraft, and would give the Army what they enjoy, systems that blow things up. Sounds like a win-win.


3 posted on 09/18/2004 7:33:28 AM PDT by ProudVet77 (Bathrobe Bombardier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl

Bump!


4 posted on 09/18/2004 8:11:30 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

Good try - but there is no way we're going to give up these capabilities.

You might not believe it, but I know a lot more people in pilot/nav training who want to be in these two aircraft than in the F-15C or F-22.

That's because blowing stuff up is COOL.


5 posted on 09/18/2004 8:16:50 AM PDT by HerrKobes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl

Bump and Happy Birthday!


6 posted on 09/18/2004 8:51:10 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl

I keep wondering where the Old Media keep getting the story wrong about the recruitment and morale issues.

Oh, yeah ... I forget ::: they're FRAUDcasters.

Thank you for continuing to bring us the truth, RCGirl.


7 posted on 09/18/2004 8:53:49 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Probably because they're looking at the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps, where morale and reenlistment rates, especially of the most useful sorts of people, are relatively low. I guess the Air Force and the Coast Guard are the place to be.


8 posted on 09/18/2004 9:58:11 AM PDT by Lizard_King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HerrKobes

That's interesting. I'm not familiar with Air Force culture but always thought they liked the supersonic stuff.
One thing I worry about is that there is an intention to use the JSF in a ground support role.


9 posted on 09/18/2004 12:07:49 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (Bathrobe Bombardier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl

Happy Birthday USAF ~ Bump!


10 posted on 09/18/2004 12:32:30 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77
It is a common misconception, based on McPeak and the fighter mafia of the 1990s. They were willing to lose the rest of the force as long as they maintained the same number of F-15C squadrons that we had at the end of the Cold War.

Nowadays, you see the USAF making great strides to get those lost capabilities back. That includes the EB-52, which was just opened up for initial bids from contractors.

As for using the JSF in the ground support role. I think the JSF was a good idea in 2001, before we learned a lot in Afghanistan and Iraq. The result? B-2s which can drop 80 GPS-guided 500 lb bombs. GPS and laser-guided munitions are more effective than aircraft mounted (on-axis) cannons like the M61A1 or unguided cluster munitions.

As long as you've got competent TACP (Tactical Air Control Party), you're often better served by B-1, B-2 or B-52 aircraft which have long-loiter times and huge weapon loads. Upgrading these bombers have put the fast-moving strike aircraft out of business, especially as they are more vulnerable to groundfire.

There will always be situations which warrant an AC-130 or A-10, but we've learned that guided munitions, targeted from the ground and dropped by loitering bombers gives US forces on-call precision air support that can't even be imagined by any other nation in the world, including our close allies such as the UK and Australia.
11 posted on 09/18/2004 12:55:48 PM PDT by HerrKobes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HerrKobes

I agree with you about using bombers in many cases. One of the coolest things I saw during the Afganistan war was B-52s flying what amounted to CAP. Sitting up there for hours and dropping munitions as needed.
The AC-130/A-10s are better suited against mobile targets.


12 posted on 09/18/2004 1:13:19 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (Bathrobe Bombardier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl

Happy Birthday USAF!

57 now. Where do the years go?


13 posted on 09/18/2004 3:30:42 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (If God had intended Kerry to be our President, we would all have sh*t for brains too!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrKobes

Who needs a tube when you have a radio?

Hoo-ah


14 posted on 09/18/2004 4:24:44 PM PDT by ASOC (You only have the freedoms you are willing to fight for today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lizard_King

I just heard on the radio that Navy re-enlistments are very good. It seems that RCGirl has posted some encouraging items about Army re-upping, but I can't recall exactly what those said.

It seems to me that the FRAUDcasters are probably at it again.
/


15 posted on 09/18/2004 5:58:33 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: B58Hustler

What a transition.
The B58 was one beautiful plane.


17 posted on 09/18/2004 6:51:42 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (Bathrobe Bombardier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson