Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/15/2004 9:25:23 AM PDT by hawaiian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: hawaiian

What part of "honorable discharge" do you not understand, Dan?


2 posted on 09/15/2004 9:27:13 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

Bush: OK, I will answer the question. I have no idea where Rather gets his phoney documents. Next.


3 posted on 09/15/2004 9:27:27 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

4 posted on 09/15/2004 9:29:01 AM PDT by happydogdesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

Answer the question..Dan...answer the question


5 posted on 09/15/2004 9:29:03 AM PDT by donnab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

Fine then, lets all start making fake documents and charges on people in journalism. It's not if its true or not, but the seriousness of the charges.


6 posted on 09/15/2004 9:29:30 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian
What is the question?
7 posted on 09/15/2004 9:29:50 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian
Answer the questions raised by our phony documents!
What a partisan twerp!
8 posted on 09/15/2004 9:30:27 AM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

And the president replied with a slight smile on his face: "You first Dan!"


9 posted on 09/15/2004 9:30:35 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian


Dan, answer the question. Why did the Corps kick you OUT for being UNFIT after a mere four MONTHS?"
10 posted on 09/15/2004 9:30:52 AM PDT by gunnygail (Founding member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. (I operate the minigun, more fun):.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian
Dan Rather To Bush: ‘Answer The Questions’

We could say the same to you, Dan. And there are a lot of questions.

"I say that with respect," he added. "They’d be a lot stronger in their campaign if they did do that."

B.S. on both counts. You have nothing but deep seated contempt for the Bushes. You know and we know it.

Bush's campaign wouldn't be stronger by answering for your fabricated memos. It is utterly disingenuous for you to play stupid and suggest that you think so. What's the old saying in politics... You don't need to make a man admit to charges, just get him to deny it and the story sticks.

11 posted on 09/15/2004 9:31:04 AM PDT by tdadams (Forget the National Guard, Kerry is AWOL from the war on terror, no memos needed to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

Arrogant little snot, isn't he? The President doesn't answer to him.


12 posted on 09/15/2004 9:31:13 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian
Dan,

You moron.
If the documents are forged, the questions raised are without merit.

I've heard cranio-rectal insertionitis can be terminal.
Please look into treatment options.

CD

13 posted on 09/15/2004 9:31:13 AM PDT by Constitution Day ("Marsa Stert is a britch and and I sit on the exhange")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

OK, I'll answer the questions. No, 42, and Kevin Bacon.


16 posted on 09/15/2004 9:31:55 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian
Dan Rather is headed to the IBM Selectric Chair.
17 posted on 09/15/2004 9:32:01 AM PDT by Use It Or Lose It ("John Kerry found a way to legalize desertion." B.G. Burkett 9/12/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

Permission to slap the idiot, SIR?


18 posted on 09/15/2004 9:32:02 AM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy (Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian
Kerry early discharge form the Navy would make a great story but CBS will never cover it or the Swift Vets.----->>>>

 

 

 

By way of comparison, here's how Kerry gamed his way
out of several years worth of USNR drills, from the
SBVFT forums, by user jwbarden

______________

You are correct that Kerry originally executed a 3/2
agreement which would have ended his active commissioned
service in DEC69 and begun a 2 year drilling obligation
ending DEC71, but notice that the agreement says it
remains in effect unless superceded by other orders.

Kerry's silver bullet propelling him out of VietNam, BUPERS
msg dtg 202117ZMAR69, ordering him to COMSTSLANT
Broolyn New York for duty as an admiral's aide, extended
his active duty to 31APR71 as a condition of the transfer.
Between the receipt of these ofders and their execution,
Kerry was able to negotiate this down to an extention on
active duty to 31AUG70, giving him 4 years active
commissioned service and relieving him of the drilling
obligation.

See his Officer Order Memoranda, page 4 of 4: http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/Office_Order_Memos.pdf

Once at COMSTSLANT, Kerry successfully requested an
early out from this extension effective 3JAN70 without
incurring any other obligation. Slick.

He was released from active duty effective 2400 3JAN70
and transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR),
a non-drilling, non-payed status.


19 posted on 09/15/2004 9:32:41 AM PDT by dennisw (Allah FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian
Wow. This article is from today and has a bunch of comments from Rather that I haven't seen before. How about this?

Mr. Rather said that the focus on questions over the veracity of the memos was a smoke screen perpetrated by right-wing allies of the Bush administration.

"I think the public, even decent people who may be well-disposed toward President Bush, understand that powerful and extremely well-financed forces are concentrating on questions about the documents because they can’t deny the fundamental truth of the story," he said. "If you can’t deny the information, then attack and seek to destroy the credibility of the messenger, the bearer of the information. And in this case, it’s change the subject from the truth of the information to the truth of the documents.

Dan has gone bye-bye.

20 posted on 09/15/2004 9:32:49 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

Dan, (hello), Bush did file FORM 180. Kerry didn't, won't, can't.


21 posted on 09/15/2004 9:32:52 AM PDT by antenna (pj journalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian

"With respect: answer the questions," said Dan Rather,

If there was any "respect" Blather wouldn't ask the question based on his fraudulent documents.

This lying POS is the one who should be answering questions.

"With respect: answer the question, Blather, Who gave you these bogus documents?"

What a slimeball.

Blessings, Bobo


22 posted on 09/15/2004 9:33:02 AM PDT by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hawaiian
Bush to Dan Rather: Go Pound Sand!
23 posted on 09/15/2004 9:34:18 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Hannity Was Right, FReepers Tend To Eat Their Own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson