Skip to comments.
CBS Statement Expect Today (Per FOX news)
FOX NEWS
| 09/15/2004
Posted on 09/15/2004 4:37:57 AM PDT by tsmith130
Kelley Wright just reported that CBS is expected to make a statement this morning regarding the documents!
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cbsnews; forgery; killian; lurch; medialies; napalminthemorning; rather; rathergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 861-869 next last
To: Miss Marple
Gosh, if they keep us waiting any longer, we're all going to be changed out of our pajamas!
361
posted on
09/15/2004 9:15:36 AM PDT
by
tsmith130
("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
To: Williams
I don't ever remember getting order to do anyting via a memo - always always always I received orders verbally via the chain of command. The ONLy time I received "orders" via paper was when they were travel orders...
362
posted on
09/15/2004 9:15:44 AM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(John Kerry is still facing pajama-clad warriors, and receiving self-inflicted wounds...)
To: CaptSkip
Well, if this isn't proof that CBS and the Kerry camp are in cahouts. CBS can't make it's announcement on time, just like Kerry's campaign appearances!!
To: Miss Marple
I don't "wait" well.
Hubby often tells me that God is trying to teach me patience. But does it have to be RIGHT now?
364
posted on
09/15/2004 9:15:51 AM PDT
by
justshe
(I guess if all you've got is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.)
To: Maigrey
I have to TV here. Did they make their statement?
Does anyone know of a link to a live CBS stream?
365
posted on
09/15/2004 9:16:08 AM PDT
by
OHelix
To: Maigrey
Yeah. They brought it down to his secretary and she is "recreating" them as we speak.
366
posted on
09/15/2004 9:16:14 AM PDT
by
cohokie
To: Miss Marple
Easy. They'll release even more forged documents to support the ones already released. Keep up the lie until it's believed. It worked for X42 many a time.
368
posted on
09/15/2004 9:16:34 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: justshe
I am getting a lot of housework done. I go do some work, then come back herre and hit refresh.
To: CaptSkip
More evidence? Well, I hope they used a more experienced forger this time...
370
posted on
09/15/2004 9:17:24 AM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(John Kerry is still facing pajama-clad warriors, and receiving self-inflicted wounds...)
To: MeekOneGOP
Hehehehe Docu-drama. I thought of that two days ago. Tee Hee.
371
posted on
09/15/2004 9:17:51 AM PDT
by
Maigrey
(Member of the semi-naked blogger Political Operative Brigade. To H#ll with pajamas!)
To: Williams
Even the fake memo telling Bush to take his physical by a certain date seems more administrative than an order to take the next hill. What do you think of my premise in post 345, namely that the memos were created to create a case that Bush escaped to Alabama on May 15 because he was trying to avoid taking a drug test?
To: CaptSkip
Rush says WSJ reporting more evidence will be proffered by SeeBS.
What evidence can they offer? The memos as presented are fake. It's not a question anymore, it's been well proved. I can't even find anyone who thinks that Democracy should be hidden underground who still believes that the memos as presented are real.
If there was a conference call last night and a decision reached to release an announcement, it would have been made by now. Which leads me to think that a producer for 60 Minutes II decided to hype tonight's show...
My guess, the suits are firing memos at each other and the legal department right now, realizing that facing congressional inquiry wouldn't exactly be the best thing for ratings.
373
posted on
09/15/2004 9:18:29 AM PDT
by
kingu
(Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Fox reporter says tey are "just now" getting word that Cox will call for an investigation by the Telecommunications Subcommittee. (A little late there, Fox, we knew this last night.)
Senator Shelby is on now supporting this.
To: Mike Bates
To: rocklobster11
I heard drug testing for the military didn't start until 1981. I don't think the technology was that all common in the early seventies.
376
posted on
09/15/2004 9:20:21 AM PDT
by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: Chad Fairbanks
There were a few times I had to give orders in writing. It was ALWAYS on official letterhead, and in the presence of the 1st Sgt. The person receiving the order signed an acknowledgement that they had received and understood the order and the 1st Sgt signed as a witness.
To: lainde
Well, she was quoted repeating, verbatim,the DNC talking points, "Bush is unfit to be Commander in Chief", and "He was selected, not elected".
378
posted on
09/15/2004 9:20:50 AM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: Miss Marple
Ha Ha!!!! YOU......who have taught me more about how to "fake your housework" during times like this then I could have imagined possible!
Glad to see you have turned over a new leaf!
379
posted on
09/15/2004 9:21:21 AM PDT
by
justshe
(I guess if all you've got is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.)
To: lainde
they did implement some sort of drug testing in 1972 or 1973, at least that's what I read from other posts. but the drug testing was not part of an annual physical.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400 ... 861-869 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson