Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USA Today acknowledges that it independently received the documents
USA Today | 9/13/04

Posted on 09/12/2004 10:18:12 PM PDT by ambrose

USA Today acknowledges that it indepedently received the documents


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbsnews; forgery; john; kerny; killian; napalminthemorning; rather; rathergate; seebsnews; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-211 next last
See under the section heading "The Politics"... This explains why there are six documents posted on the USA Today website, and not just the four that See BS referred to.
1 posted on 09/12/2004 10:18:12 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

link:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-09-12-bush-documents_x.htm


2 posted on 09/12/2004 10:18:24 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

USA Today needs to come clean - who is the forger?


3 posted on 09/12/2004 10:22:11 PM PDT by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Hmm, so three major news outlets received the same documents independently?

I say three because I believe the Boston Globe also received them as well.

Folks, the DNC is involved in this, and this makes Watergate look like amateur hour.
4 posted on 09/12/2004 10:23:09 PM PDT by Carling (What happened to Sandy Burglar's Docs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; charleston1

Ping!


5 posted on 09/12/2004 10:23:47 PM PDT by abner (http://www.swiftvets.com or http://www.wintersoldier.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

"It is unclear where the documents, if they are real, had been kept in the intervening three decades."

I would say this is a darn good question.


6 posted on 09/12/2004 10:24:34 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

This sounds like Burkett gave them both to USA and to CBS.


7 posted on 09/12/2004 10:25:09 PM PDT by Texasforever (Kerry's new slogan "IT'S NOT THE STUPID CANDIDATE SO STOP SAYING THAT")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I have a sneaking suspicion that it's this talion.com that is behind this smear.

1) Burkett was one of their clients in 2000 when this first surfaced.
2) They are Washington-based, as was the See BS producer (Maples) prior to when she started working for See BS out of Dallas.
3) They orchestrated the DNC DUI dirty trick perpetrated against Bush in 2000.
4) They provide experts for journalists on a deadline --- hmmmm.. where do you think the handwriting expert See BS used came from?

Now, if we could only link these smelly partisan hacks definitively to the DNC and Kerry to complete the puzzle.
8 posted on 09/12/2004 10:27:47 PM PDT by GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Ping


9 posted on 09/12/2004 10:29:05 PM PDT by madison46 (Bandwagon was full when it left the gate - I hope it remains too full for frogs & co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

"No matter how it turns out, for now the controversy over the documents has blunted criticism of Bush's Guard record, which has been a persistent irritant for Bush since he first campaigned for the White House. It has sapped the power from an issue that had appeared to be a weapon for the Democrats against Bush."

This paragraph is the most important one for the Bush campaign. The DNC/CBS+Boston Globe/Kerry campaign/probably Burkett failed in ATTACK 1 of the FORTUNATE SON campaign. There will be more strikes this week but the first one was not only a dud but a major backfire.


10 posted on 09/12/2004 10:29:24 PM PDT by plushaye (President Bush - Four more years! Thanks Swifties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Burkett is the fall guy for the DNC. They will dump this on a mentally unstable, disgruntled Vet and wipe their hands clean. Even if the docs came from a wacko, somebody had to run with them. Another Vet wasted by Kerry for political gain! W04
11 posted on 09/12/2004 10:29:25 PM PDT by sixxiron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

forgibe my typo:




independently


12 posted on 09/12/2004 10:30:53 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Interesting how only now, when the walls are closing in on Dan Rather and CBS over these forgeries, does USA Today come forward and admit they received copies as well. I believe they call this "running for the tall grass."
13 posted on 09/12/2004 10:32:55 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

So, someone gives you documents that seem very important on an issue of great importance to you as a reporter. Do you: (a) just quote the documents and ignore where they came from; or (b) attempt to write a story that presents the documents and tells the reader where they came from and where they may have been hidden? I don't buy that there is someone who "could be retaliated against" who must be protected as a source here.


14 posted on 09/12/2004 10:34:00 PM PDT by pushforbush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I'm declaring John Sasso as the man behind this; this job has his mo stamped all over it. You'd think he'd have learned that the truth will out.


15 posted on 09/12/2004 10:34:18 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

You're forgiben.


16 posted on 09/12/2004 10:34:30 PM PDT by JennysCool (Funny how militant environmentalists always ruin the lawn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Carling
Folks, the DNC is involved in this, and this makes Watergate look like amateur hour.

Not until the Justice Dept. gets involved it doesn't.
17 posted on 09/12/2004 10:35:11 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

CBS, USA TODAY ,and what is the third media source that recieved the documents??

This just shows that someone was shopping these documents!!

CBS did not uncover them......there was no investigation....there was only A SMEAR thet someone wanted to be broadcast!!


18 posted on 09/12/2004 10:36:25 PM PDT by sissyjane (Does Rice show up on X-Rays??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carling
Folks, the DNC is involved in this, and this makes Watergate look like amateur hour.

I agree, this goes beyond typical dirty tricks and into criminal activity. I just don't understand why the GOP does not seem to be making a stink and investigating who made these memos. Forging government documents is a serious offense and can't just laugh it off.

19 posted on 09/12/2004 10:36:34 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

"forgibe my typo: "

I forgibe you. ;)


20 posted on 09/12/2004 10:36:43 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson