[FredZarguna]

OK, they've shot their bolt.

Here's the summary:

1) They really haven't addressed any of the criticisms of the documents except the "th" and a couple of minor details.
2) They got a handwriting guy who's an obvious partisan, who says he stands by the claim that the signature is legit, and he knew going in he'd be slimed.
3) Content of the documents is what really matters.

So there's really nothing backing up their story. Back to Fox.

[Libertarian444]

2) They got a handwriting guy who's an obvious partisan, who says he stands by the claim that the signature is legit, and he knew going in he'd be slimed.

Demand an INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Mike Fieschko]

2) They got a handwriting guy who's an obvious partisan, who says he stands by the claim that the signature is legit, and he knew going in he'd be slimed.

Apples and oranges. You don't hire a handwriting expert to check a DOCUMENT'S authenticity.