Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread: CBS Evening News (Dan tells us why we're all wrong)
www.freerepublic.com | September 10, 2004

Posted on 09/10/2004 3:18:38 PM PDT by Howlin

Edited on 09/10/2004 4:53:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Have at it.

******Transcript************



'KEY CHALLENGES TO NATIONAL GUARD DOCUMENTS ANSWERED'
Fri Sep 10 2004 19:03:11 ET

The biggest challenges to the authenticity of the documents featured in the 60 MINUTES segment on President Bush's Texas National Guard service are answered in a report to be broadcast on the CBS EVENING NEWS tonight (6:30-7:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network. The report states that the type style, typewriter and the superscript function critics claim did not exist at the time the memos from President Bush's former Texas National Guard commander were typed were indeed all available. In fact, similar raised "th" superscripts have been found on other National Guard documents the White House has released from the president's file.

Furthermore, Marcel Mately, the document and handwriting expert used to authenticate the documents for CBS News and 60 MINUTES, asserts that copies of the memos critics are examining have been degraded by reproduction though photocopying, computer scanning and faxing and are not reliable representations of the memos.

A transcript is attached:

BUSH DOCUMENTS

EVENING NEWS WITH DAN RATHER

9-10-04

Rather Lead In: There were attacks today on the CBS News "60 Minutes" report this week raising new questions about President Bush's Vietnam-era time in the Texas Air National Guard. The questions raised by our report include:

--Did a wealthy Texas oilman-friend of the Bush family use his influence with the speaker of the Texas House of Representatives .. to get George W. Bush a coveted slot in the National Guard .. keeping him out of the draft and any probable service IN Vietnam?

--Did Lieutenant Bush refuse a direct order from his commanding officer?

--Was Lieutenant. Bush suspended for failure to perform up to standards?

--Did Lieutenant Bush ever take a physical he was required and ordered to take? If not, why not?

--And did Lieutenant Bush, in fact, complete his commitment to the Guard?

These questions grew out of new witnesses and new evidence -- including documents written by Lieutenant Bush's squadron commander.

Today, on the internet and elsewhere, some people -- including many who are partisan political operatives -- concentrated not on the key questions the overall story raised but on the documents that were part of the support of the story.

They alleged the documents are FAKE.

Rather: MANY OF THOSE RAISING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CBS DOCUMENTS HAVE FOCUSED ON SOMETHING CALLED SUPERSCRIPT... A KEY THAT AUTOMATICALLY TYPES A RAISED "TH". CRITICS CLAIM TYPEWRITERS DIDN'T HAVE THAT ABILITY IN THE 70S. BUT SOME MODELS DID....IN FACT, OTHER BUSH MILITARY RECORDS ALREADY OFFICIALLY RELEASED BY THE WHITE HOUSE ITSELF SHOW THE SAME SUPERSCRIPT.

HERE'S ONE..... FROM 1968.

SOME ANALYSTS OUTSIDE CBS SAY THEY BELIEVE THE TYPEFACE ON THESE MEMOS IS NEW TIMES ROMAN.... WHICH THEY CLAIM WAS NOT AVAILABLE IN THE 1970S.

BUT THE OWNER OF THE COMPANY THAT DISTRIBUTES THIS TYPING STYLE.... SAYS IT HAS BEEN AVAILABE SINCE 1931. DOCUMENT AND HANDWRITING EXAMINER MARCEL MATLEY ANALYZED THE DOCUMENTS FOR CBS NEWS.

HE SAYS HE BELIEVES THEY ARE REAL...BUT IS CONCERNED ABOUT EXACTLY WHAT IS BEING EXAMINED BY SOME OF THE PEOPLE QUESTIONING THE DOCUMENTS....BECAUSE DETIORATION OCCURS EACH TIME A DOCUMENT IS REPRODUCED.....AND THE DOCUMENTS BEING ANALYZED OUTSIDE OF CBS HAVEBEEN PHOTOCOPIED, FAXED, SCANNED AND DOWNLOADED.... AND ARE FAR REMOVED FROM THE DOCUMENTS CBS STARTED WITH WHICH WERE ALSO PHOTOCOPIES.

DOCUMENT AND HANDWRITING EXAMINER MARCEL MATLEY DID THIS INTERVIEW WITH US PRIOR TO THE 60 MINUTES BROADCAST.

HE LOOKED AT THE DOCUMENTS AND THE SIGNATURES OF COLONEL JERRY KILLIAN.... COMPARING KNOWN DOCUMENTS WITH THE COLONEL'S SIGNATURE ON THE NEWSLY DISCOVERED ONES.

Matley: "WE LOOK BASICALLY AT WHAT'S CALLED SIGNIFICANT OR INSIGNIFICANT FEATURES TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT'S THE SAME PERSON OR NOT. I HAVE NO PROBLEM IDENTIFYING THEM.

I WOULD SAY BASED ON OUR AVAILABLE HANDWRITING EVIDENCE, YES. THIS IS THE SAME PERSON."

Rather: MATLEY FINDS THE SIGNAT'URES TO BE SOME OF THE MOST COMPELLING EVIDENCE...WE TALKED TO HIM AGAIN TODAY BY SATELLITE.

Matley "SINCE IT IS REPRESENTED THAT SOME OF THEM ARE DEFINITELY HIS... THEN WE CAN CONCLUDE THEY ARE HIS SIGNATURES."

Rather: "ARE YOU SURPRISED THAT QUESTIONS COME ABOUT THESE. WE'RE NOT, BUT I WAS WONDERING IF YOU'RE SURPRISED."

Matley: "I KNEW GOING IN THAT THIS WAS DYNAMITE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER AND I KNEW THAT POTENTIALLY IT WAS FAR MORE POTENTIAL DAMAGE TO ME PROFESSIONALLY THAN BENEFIT ME. AND I KNEW THAT. BUT WE SEEK THE TRUTH. THAT'S WHAT WE DO. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO PUT YOURSELF OUT. TO SEEK THE TRUTH AND TAKE WHAT COMES FROM IT."

Rather: ROBERT STRONG WAS AN ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR THE TEXAS AIR NATIONAL GUARD DURING THE VIETNAM YEARS. HE KNEW COL. JERRY KILLIAN, THE MAN CREDITED WITH WRITING THE DOCUMENTS.... AND PAPER WORK... LIKE THESE DOCUMENTS...WAS HIS SPECIALTY. HE IS STANDING BY HIS JUDGEMENT THAT THE DOCUMENTS ARE REAL.

Rather: "WHEN YOU READ THROUGH THESE DOCUMENTS, IS THERE ANY DOUBT IN YOUR MIND THAT THESE ARE GENUINE?"

Strong: "WELL,, THEY ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE WAY BUSINESS WAS DONE AT THAT TIME. THEY ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE MAN THAT I REMEMBER JERRY KILLIAN BEING. I DON'T SEE ANYTHING IN THE DOCUMENTS THAT'S DISCORDANT WITH WHAT WERE THE TIMES, WHAT WERE THE SITUATION OR WHAT WERE THE PEOPLE INVOLVED."

Rather: STRONG SAYS THE HIGHLY CHARGED POLITICAL ATMOSPHERE OF THE GUARD AT THE TIME... WAS PERFECTLY REPRESENTED IN THE NEW DOCUMENTS

Strong: "IT VERGED ON OUTRIGHT CORRUPTION IN TERMS OF THE FAVORS THAT WERE DONE, THE POWER THAT WAS TRADED. AND IT WAS UNCONSCIONABLE. FROM A MORAL AND ETHICAL STANDPOINT. IT WAS UNCONSCIONABLE."

Rather: IT IS THE INFORMATION IN THE NEW DOCUMENTS THAT IS MOST COMPELLING FOR PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH PRESIDENT BUSH'S RECORD IN THE NATIONAL GUARD. AUTHOR JIM MORE HAS WRITTEN TWO BOOKS ON THE SUBJECT.

Rather: "YOU'VE STUDIED PRESIDENT BUSH'S RECORDS FOR 10 YEARS.. ARE THESE DOCUMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE RECORD AS YOU KNOW IT?"

Moore: "THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY CONSISTENT WITH THE RECORDS AS I KNOW IT."

Rather: "PUT IT IN CONTEXT AND PERSPECTIVE FOR US ... THE STORY AND WHAT WE CALL THE COUNTERATTACK ON THE STORY. WHERE ARE WE RIGHT NOW?

Moore "I THINK WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS SOME INCRIMINATING DOCUMENTS HAVE COME OUT. THE WHITE HOUSE, YOU SHOULD REMEMBER, HAS NOT DISCREDITED THE DOCUMENTS. THEY'RE RELYING ON THE BLOGOSPHERE AND OTHER PEOPLE TO DO THAT. BECAUSE THE WHITE HOUSE PROBABLY KNOWS THESE DOCUMENTS ARE IN FACT REAL."

Rather Tag: The "60 Minutes" report was based NOT solely on the recovered documents .. but on a preponderance of evidence .. including documents that were provided by un-impeachable sources .. and interviews with former officials of the Texas National Guard. If any definitive evidence to the contrary of our story is found, we will report it.

So far, there is none.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: District of Columbia; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; brithume; bush; cbs; cbslies; dannyrather; danratherbiased; disgraceful; dnctalkingpoints; downwiththeship; foxnews; fredbarnes; frequency; juanwilliams; jumpedtheshark; killian; lyingliar; mediabias; memos; outofworkhack; ratherbiased; resignnow; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 1,301-1,313 next last
To: BunnySlippers
the seriousness of the charges outweigh the document's authenticity.

That's exactly what Tip O'Neil said when challenged about having hearings on Reagan's so-called "October Suprise".

561 posted on 09/10/2004 3:54:43 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: engrpat

Yes, Juan is not too bright, but at the risk of being flamed, he's not the worst of the Dem hacks.


562 posted on 09/10/2004 3:54:45 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

See #517 to add to your list.


563 posted on 09/10/2004 3:54:46 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Agreed...the whole liberal establishment, their pundits, etc. have a huge vested interest in making Dan look credible. But that gets increasingly difficult with each passing day.


564 posted on 09/10/2004 3:54:51 PM PDT by A Jovial Cad ("I had no shoes and I complained, until I saw a man who had no feet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Oh that was worth the increase in my blood pressure! Mort & Fred tore into Juan!

Duh, Juan, why should we address the allegations if the documents are Frauds!!! Especially since the allegations having a place in truth have already been addressed?

Is this a preview of what is going to happen to Colmes tonight? LOL


565 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:04 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Let's hope the pressure is building in the board room of VIACOM!


566 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:18 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Marcel Matley is a 'Forensic Expert Witness' for hire.

http://www.forensic.org/experts/matley.html


567 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:31 PM PDT by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Hmm, Mr. Marcel Matley doesn't think Kurt Cobain wrote his own suicide note.


568 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:34 PM PDT by EllaMinnow (John Kerry won't be happy until he's made us all as miserable as he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

White washing it deluxe...ours are copies, been through numerous copy machines...blah, blah, blah


569 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:36 PM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

ATTENTION

Not satisfied with the document examiner's skill or possible bias?

Contact the organization, the National Association of Document Examiners',that certifies him and lodge a complaint!

Contact NADE's President, Katherine Koppenhaver, or call toll free number: 1-866-569-0833. http://www.documentexaminers.org/

570 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:41 PM PDT by BlackRain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
the seriousness of the charges outweigh the document's authenticity. Which is absurd.

In English that basically means: we like the lie better than the truth.
571 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:53 PM PDT by uncitizen (Beware of fertilizer salesmen and their lawyers. They'll both try to sell you a load of crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: Maigrey

Advertising list for first block:
Lamisil anti-fungal tablets
Levitra male satisfaction tablets
Sugar Free LifeSavers
Smart Balance margarine


Ack......NOT Smart Balance!!! I FINALLY found a butter substitue that hubby will eat.


572 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:59 PM PDT by baseballmom (You Know Where I Stand - GW Bush - 9/2/04 We're standing with you, Mr. President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal
Thanks for the transcripts

Many of those raising questions about the cbs documents have focused on something called superscript-- a key that automatically types a raised "th". Critics claim typewriters didn't have that ability in the '70s. But some models did.

In fact, other bush military records already released by the white house itself show the same superscript. Here's one from 1968.

That's actually a good point. Unfortunately for Rather, the superscript found in other documents is completely different from the superscript in CBS documents.

The kern and height of a 1973-typewriter superscript is dissimilar from the kern and height of the CBS-document superscript. Therefore, Rather is providing evidence against his own documents with his failed obfuscation.

Some analysts outside cbs say they believe the typeface on these memos is new times roman, which they claim was not available in the 1970s. But the owner of the company that distributes this typing style, says it has been available since 1931.

The claim I've read is that the type was available for printing machines, not for typewriters. Is Rather claiming that these documents were produced in a printer shop instead of an office typewriter?

573 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:59 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: TXBubba

My CBS affiliate was rude to me too. Told me to take it up with CBS. I told them I'd take it up with the sponsors to their local broadcasts.


574 posted on 09/10/2004 3:55:59 PM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

At least the local Austin affiliate....remember that's liberal Austin.


575 posted on 09/10/2004 3:56:00 PM PDT by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

If Rather only had photocopies to authenticate HIS report, then the photocopies should be good enough for other experts to DISPROVE it, shouldn't it?


576 posted on 09/10/2004 3:56:03 PM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: zlala

I don't trust anybody that Dan uses.


577 posted on 09/10/2004 3:56:04 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
"I think the second expert interviewed by rather is the forger."

Strong. Everything he said was the exact opposite of Col. William Campanini. And from what I gather from posting on FR, Strong is on Soros' payroll.

Tell me more. Link?

578 posted on 09/10/2004 3:56:09 PM PDT by Marylander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Not to mention Juanita Broaddrick


579 posted on 09/10/2004 3:56:12 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (What part of SHALL PASS NO LAW do they not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Tape delay on the West Coast has been around forever. You think Rather, Jennings, Brokaw, etc are going to read the news twice???

Why do you think that no one watches network news anymore? It's old.

Outside of a few tests decades ago, it's never been live out West.


580 posted on 09/10/2004 3:56:12 PM PDT by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 1,301-1,313 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson