Problem - They're going to obsess over the superscript "th" while ignoring the other overwhelming evidence. Then let the weekend and Ivan the Terrible cover up any further discussion of the other issues with the documents. Presto, chango, another Burger-gate coverup.
bingo.
Well, Rather says the documents are "authentic"...what does that really mean??? All depends on what the definition of "is" is....here we go again.
Is there any reason why CBS could not be sued for liable, given their public assertion that they obtained the documents and know the source and they are not disclosing it?? Could they not be FORCED to provide that information in a court of law??? And what will the Bush administration's comments be about this????