Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ScottFromSpokane
No Ltc would have written a military rank abbreviation as 1st Lt. The proper military abbreviation I have been told, for the Air Force was lLt.
45 posted on 09/09/2004 4:01:44 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: YOUGOTIT
No Ltc would have written a military rank abbreviation as 1st Lt. The proper military abbreviation I have been told, for the Air Force was lLt.

Actually "1st Lt" is the correct abbreviation. It is the Army that uses "1LT."

That doesn't mean the documents are genuine. The correct abbreviation for lieutenant colonel is "Lt Col" (no periods), not "Lt. Colonel." And the 147th Fighter Interceptor Group is "147 FIG."

The documents have serious, serious problems.

66 posted on 09/09/2004 4:11:07 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: YOUGOTIT

In the Air Force...the proper abbreviation IS 1st Lt now. Not sure what it was back then but the latest guidance is to write it as 1st Lt. This is for Air Force only. The army is still different. Also...Lt. Col. is the proper abbreviation now. Up until the change earlier this year...it was LTC...like the army still is. Not sure what the abbreviations were 30 years ago...but I suspect the person wh did the hoax looked at a current rank abbreviation guide.


264 posted on 09/10/2004 7:05:00 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson