[Right Wing Professor]

Forensics expert on Hugh Hewitt currently

• Superscript is suspicious.
• Can't say about the font.
• Proportional font means nothing in itself.
• Can't rule out smart quotes: needs to see font.
• Can't answer why MS Word reproduces doc. exactly.
• If pushed to give an opinion right now, would say they're forged.
• Philip Bouffard (cited by a blogger) is very credible; Bouffard says 90% sure they're forged. Expert says Bouffard wrote the book on font examination.

[boop]

I thought the most DAMNING aspect is how it showed letters like "i" being tucked under, say an "f". This would only happen on a computer. How would a 1972 typewriter "know" what letter came first, and then to tuck it under?

[backinthefold]

(at over 500+ replys this may be irrelavent)

**Superscript is suspicious.**

Spoke to my office manager, who graduated UTC (UC at the time) in '72 degree in business, she could type 70+ words a min at the time...

NO superscrip on ANY typewriters at that time. She NEVER saw superscript till PCs came out