Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan
"The IBM Executive was introduced in the 1940's and I guarandamntee you it had proportional fonts."

____________________________________

According to IBM the Executive was introduced in the 1950's and used the traditional hammer style type . Hammer type cannot produce proportional "fonts".

593 posted on 09/09/2004 12:22:04 PM PDT by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies ]


To: daylate-dollarshort
According to IBM the Executive was introduced in the 1950's and used the traditional hammer style type . Hammer type cannot produce proportional "fonts".
Is the IBM sales literature in error then?
598 posted on 09/09/2004 12:27:26 PM PDT by _Jim (s <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

To: daylate-dollarshort

I forgot to add.....

Proportional printing on the executive came out in 1954 or 55.


600 posted on 09/09/2004 12:28:55 PM PDT by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

To: daylate-dollarshort

"According to IBM the Executive was introduced in the 1950's and used the traditional hammer style type . Hammer type cannot produce proportional "fonts".
"

Wrong again. Sheesh....just back up the thread and look at the ad for the 1953 Executive. Or go on Google and search for "IBM Executive Typewriter." IT TYPED USING PROPORTIONAL SPACING! These "Experts" are not experts if they don't know that.


606 posted on 09/09/2004 12:30:35 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson