If you were to look at the records of both candidates prior to 9/11, you probably wouldn't have been able to tell what either one would have done.
Perhaps some think that it would be better to go with one that would have learned from the others mistakes, and try something new...than to continue with one that they disagree with.
Well done !!
I think the Times should have just printed the above sentence. It sums up the whole question of "If Kerry becomes president" nicely.
Very factual and fairly non-partisan article. Someone you know write this?
The WTC has been bombed twice. What was Clinton's rebuttal to the first bombing?????
The point is that, pre-9/11, the government (clinton) treated the terrorists as criminals. Post-9/11 Bush treated them as enemies.
The clinton government did little or nothing to combat the situation because of this mind set. How do you "arrest" criminals hiding in Afghanistan?
BIG BUMP for exposing the Times' complicity in lying...