Posted on 09/06/2004 1:33:13 AM PDT by kattracks
Know how Rudy got the crime rate down so much in NYC? He instituted police state tactics at the expense of the Bill of Rights. Sure that'll work, just ask Stalin, Hitler and Ivan the Terrible (not the hurricane).
For my money give me JEB/CONDI RICE in 2008.
That's ridiculous. We were not a police state. Rudy simply enforced all the laws.
Well, you're correct about Dimwit Dinkins.
I stand by my assertion that New York liberalism has exerted a major negative impact on the country in the form of the two Senators mentioned and their furtherance of the anti-gun/anti-freedom agenda. Look at what happened at the Empire State Building a few years ago. A random nut case shooting. When it came to light that the gun was purchased in Virginia, that brought on a whole spate of federal bills to expand the gun controls into other states. But IIRC, Rudy started the ball rolling by making the call for those national laws. Another 20,000 laws that don't work in the name of control. Rudy and Hillary and chuckie all know that gun control does nothing to control crime. They don't care. Because what they really want is to control people.
If these truly were the choices (and of course they aren't), the GOP would be in its death throes...doomed to the same fate as the Whigs.
Obviously the writer knows nary a thing about the Republican nominating electorate.
I know! That's exactly how I feel...I'm really in luck because I have so many regional candidates to choose from -Santorum, Ridge, Pataki, Giuliani, and Romney...
It should be interesting to see what Ridge does...I have a sneaking suspicion that if he wants to run for President, he will ask Bush to move to the Pentagon. That would make him the Administration candidate.
Pataki and Giulinai cannot both run...for either one to win the nomination would require the full financial advantage that hailing from NY would bring...
If Guiliani goes for the brass ring, Pataki should concentrate on getting the Hildebeast out of the Senate. Kill two birds with one stone.
Hillary shredded documents related to the Whitewater investigation at the Rose Law Firm to protect her husband. FBI files on political opponents were found in her private quarters. She was the author of the Clinton's national healthcare initiative. As co-president, she and husband Bill kowtowed to terrorists like the KLA and Arafat, refused to pursue Bin Laden for political reasons, sold coffees for political contributions, accepted campaign money from the Chinese government and helped get Netanyahu defeated in the hopes of establishing a legacy...an act that sparked worldwide jihad when Arafat rejected every one of Barak's offers.
Rudy is an extremely successful former U.S. attorney whose reforms remade New York into a great, liveable city worth visiting. He's tough on crime, he's pro-business, he's pro-Israel, he's a proven leader in times of crisis, he's an ally of this President, and he's terrorism's worst nightmare...a pro-defense prosecutor with a will and a long memory.
There is no reason for any conservative to vote for Hillary Clinton in a race against Rudolph Giuliani. Although they're both pro-choice, where they disagree, from a conservative standpoint Rudy beats her on every issue.
There is no reason for any conservative to vote for Hillary Clinton in a race against Rudolph Giuliani. Although they're both pro-choice, where they disagree, from a conservative standpoint Rudy beats her on every issue.
Yes I know, I was just being sarcastic, it just bugs me that he is againt abortion but votes for it, who does that sound like?
You are right. The largest and most powerful voting block in the USA, socially conservative Christians, would surely find and nominate its own verison of a Ross Perot or George Wallace.
How does Rudy Giuliani vote for abortion?
Socially conservative Christians might do that. It would depend on which candidate they'd want to defeat.
If they wanted to defeat Rudy, they'd run their own candidate.
If they wanted to defeat Hillary, they'd vote for Rudy.
Mayor Rudy has to look to his Right to see Thurgood Marshall.
Won't be Jeb. One of the problems W had was being the son of a recent former president him running looked kind of monarchistic. W's brother running immediately after W would be even more so. Jeb's gonna have to wait until at least 2016 maybe 2020 (2 or 3 terms after his brother).
Where does he stand on the 2nd amendment?
That old chestnut ain't going to work. Not when both candidates are set square against your core values.
If Rudy won the Republican nomination after a fair primary fight and social conservatives refused to support him, voting for a third-party candidate and leading to a Hillary Clinton victory, social conservatives will be responsible for Hillary's election.
The issue of abortion will not be decided at the executive level of government, and neither the House nor the Senate has the political will to pass a constitutional amendment outlawing it or overturning Roe. The issue will be decided in the courts.
Social conservatives had better pray Hillary is never elected President and should work to prevent such an abomination at all costs, even if it means the election of a Republican moderate. Her nominess to the bench will make Steve Bryer look like Antonin Scalia. With Rudy you at least get a shot at constructionists.
Of course, if you don't give a rat's ass about the unborn, vote for a third-party candidate in a Hillary/Rudy election should the opportunity arise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.