Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SuziQ
I agree with you.

Bush flirted with hydrogen some months ago but hydrogen without nuclear plants to produce it simply moves the inflection point and pollution point to an earlier link in the chain.

We will have another oil shock or a serious strike against the homeland and then and only then will we clear away all the legalistic underbrush which gives the left utter control of our energy policy through the courts. Perhaps then will we drill Anwar and produce hydrogen with nuclear energy.
23 posted on 09/03/2004 12:29:11 AM PDT by nathanbedford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

I'm not so sure it's gonna take another attack. I think Bush may go all out in this term to push for a drastic energy policy, and if he wins with a good margin, can comfortably claim a mandate to do it!


24 posted on 09/03/2004 5:36:02 AM PDT by SuziQ (Bush in 2004-Because we MUST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson