Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Graybeard58

Now that's the way I see it. Let's see Obama ve Keyes? Boxer vs Keyes? Hillary vs Keyes? Kennedy vs Keyes? Daschle vs Keyes? Harkin vs Keyes? Choice is simple. This ain't exactly rocket science.


73 posted on 09/02/2004 2:41:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

>>>Now that's the way I see it. Let's see Obama ve Keyes? Boxer vs Keyes? Hillary vs Keyes? Kennedy vs Keyes? Daschle vs Keyes? Harkin vs Keyes? Choice is simple. This ain't exactly rocket science.

What about Bush vs. Keyes? Would you have supported him in a primary challenge of the President from the right?.


81 posted on 09/02/2004 2:48:53 PM PDT by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
"Let's see Obama ve Keyes? Boxer vs Keyes? Hillary vs Keyes? Kennedy vs Keyes? Daschle vs Keyes? Harkin vs Keyes? Choice is simple.

In those states where even the pinkest RINO hasn't a prayer of being elected to the Senate, running Alan Keyes should make perfect sense Republicans of any stripe, even a yellow stripe. The press will be hard put to ignore him like they usually do and he will therefore be a perfect position to advance conservative ideas with voters who may have gotten precious little exposure to them previously. He is also capable of showing up the likes of Kennedy, Daschle, etal who are all terrified of facing him in debate -- a challenge he will taunt them with the entire election. That alone serves a very worthwhile purpose.

161 posted on 09/02/2004 5:25:27 PM PDT by Bonaparte (and guess who sighs his lullabies, to nights that never end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson