To: Petronski
I just caught the tail-end of Carl Cameron's report on Fox News. He's saying that Kerry is planning on fighting back against the speeches at the convention, and will specificially raise questions about Bush's National Guard service and Cheney's deferments. This is a riot, since neither of them has said anything detrimental about Kerry's service. He still doesn't get it.
498 posted on
09/02/2004 4:42:42 PM PDT by
mass55th
( “Where they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings.”)
To: mass55th
Why is Edwards deferral never mentioned?
505 posted on
09/02/2004 4:46:00 PM PDT by
mathluv
(Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
To: mass55th
This is a riot, since neither of them has said anything detrimental about Kerry's serviceThat's the genius of Joe Lockhart. If the campaign isn't working, TURN UP THE VOLUME.
Kinda like an English speaker in a foreign land trying to make himself understood by talking LOUDER.
514 posted on
09/02/2004 4:48:24 PM PDT by
Petronski
(With what? Spitballs!?!)
To: mass55th
Bush's National Guard service and Cheney's deferments.
Kerry is stuck in a quagmire of 35 years ago. He can't seem to move on. He's been sitting in the Senate for the last 19 years, waiting. Now that he has the opportunity, he goes back and tries to run on stuff that happened 35 years ago. [Kerry is clueless.]
536 posted on
09/02/2004 4:56:28 PM PDT by
TomGuy
(His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson