Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gobucks

I'm not a weather expert, and realize that hurricanes can quickly lose strength over land, but the areas on that map prjected to receive cat 2,3, & 4 winds seem awfully shallow for a storm that size.


390 posted on 09/01/2004 2:23:39 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat ("History? I love history! So sequential....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]


To: All
For anyone hanging their hat on the hurricane losing strength over land, go back and look at the Charley track. Then calculate the distance between landfall on the west coast and it's exit point on the east coast. Subtract 10 miles since damage on the coast wasn't that bad. The Orlando area got POUNDED by that hurricane that "should have lost strength over land." That is a minimum of 100 miles of significant damage and it went diagonally across the state which should have maximized any land attenuation effect.
398 posted on 09/01/2004 2:37:30 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Kerry was in the Senate???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat

The winds stayed very strong with the recent storm and for a shorter period of time.

That map is wishful thinking. 100 mph winds in Orlando are likely at the very least......likely much much stronger.


422 posted on 09/01/2004 3:38:23 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson