I missed the show this am but I would disagree with him as well. Not only did the 1st purple heart get cleared up this week with the conclusion that it was fraudulent (thanks to Adm. Schaecte) but also Lehman has mentioned he never issued that new citation/signed the paperwork for the silver star replacement. How are these facts lining up to support Kerry? I am assuming Brit's refering to the Bronze Star episode with enemy fire because Mark Simon from WABC mentioned on his show yesterday am that the paperwork supports Kerry. Problem is, all the official paperwork probably supports Kerry BECAUSE HE WROTE THE DAMN REPORTS.
I think Brit needs to be emailed that we respectfully disagree with his assesment of the controversy. Kerry needs to release all his records and answer some questions such as did he write the reports.
I wanted to say you articulated very well exactly why I disagreed with Brit.
When the Kerry Kamp is conceding the first purple heart just might have been due to an accidentally self-inflicted wound, vindication is not what it is called.
Throw in the fact that everybody concedes the Christmas in Cambodia story was false and I have to say it is the Swift Vets that are standing tall and looking righteous.
Someone who saw O'Neill on Politically Incorrect the other night said he was very compelling when he pointed out how the action reports focused on Kerry's boat and not the boat that had hit the mine. The poster said the audience seemed persuaded that was strong evidence that Kerry was the one writing up the report. I hadn't heard O'Neill put it quite that way but it is a very compelling point.