[silversky]

Are you telling me that the US soldiers are risking their lives in some act of ritual revenge? That sound policy and reason don't play a role any more? If old feuds and paybacks were the issue, we would be fighting in Vietnam now. And how come "the oil" shields Saudi? It only makes a more pressing target... Iran is not a Wahhaby country. They don't fund terrorists nor endorse their ideology. Saudi Arabia does both. This "matter of policy" is not clean. The clean solution is to destroy Radical Islam. Islamic Radicalism is worse than social radicalism (communism). It comes close to Nazism and should be swept clean from the face of the Earth. Starting with its source - Saudi Arabia.

[Calpernia]

>>>>We aim at Iran because its government has, over a period of decades, carried out Acts Of War against this country and its civilians. Beginning with the Hostage crisis, on through the Beruit bombings, and multiple hijackings and murders.

Old feuds? Iran is flexing! They have nuclear weapons and are pointing at the USA, Israel and India. What are you talking about with 'old feuds'? This is now.

[Long Cut]

"If old feuds and paybacks were the issue, we would be fighting in Vietnam now."

Iran's government has carried out attacks against this country right up to today. See Al-Najaf for an example. It's hardly an "old feud", and since when did that ever stop an Islamonazi?

" Iran is not a Wahhaby country. They don't fund terrorists nor endorse their ideology..."

ROFLMAO! They may not be Wahabbis, but they sure as Hell fund and support terrorists. See Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc. After this statement, I assign you NO credibility whatsoever.

"The clean solution is to destroy Radical Islam. Islamic Radicalism is worse than social radicalism (communism). It comes close to Nazism and should be swept clean from the face of the Earth."

On this, we agree. INCLUDING the Islamic fascists in Iran. ESPECIALLY so now that they are getting nukes.

[silversky]

They have nuclear weapons and are pointing at the USA, Israel and India.

Riiiiight. Iraq has piles of WMD too. All pointing EVERYWHERE. So if it's not about old feuds it's about wild speculations. I feel a lot better now. /sarcasm

[Calpernia]

>>>And how come "the oil" shields Saudi?

First of all; don't even try to bring in the oil propaganda.

The USA has more oil than Saudi up in good ole Gull Island Alaska. That cap is on the oil due to the agreement to protect the Saudi royals and provide the Middle East an income. BUT the Saudis have to set the behavioral example.

Obviously the standard is in question. Hence the example being set in Iraq.