To: PinnedAndRecessed
A woman who agreed to have a child with her lesbian partner, but split up with the mother before the baby's birth, cannot be forced to pay child support, the state's highest court ruled Wednesday.Ah ... so gays want the right to marry ... the right to adopt children ... but shouldn't be required to pay for kids they helped bring into the world.
2 posted on
08/25/2004 9:52:06 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(Forget Berger's socks - has ANYONE searched his skin folds for classified documents?)
To: PinnedAndRecessed
I bet they track down the sperm donor and make him pay
the lesbos dont want equal treatment after all...hmmm
3 posted on
08/25/2004 9:52:42 AM PDT by
Mr. K
To: PinnedAndRecessed
5 posted on
08/25/2004 9:55:34 AM PDT by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: PinnedAndRecessed
And the liberal agenda continues: do what you want, we'll make certain you don't have to deal with the consequences...
To: PinnedAndRecessed
Un-(appropriate expletive deleted)-believable Bump.
7 posted on
08/25/2004 9:58:15 AM PDT by
inquest
(Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
To: PinnedAndRecessed
Dykes don't have to pay, but men who can prove through DNA tests that a kid is not their's have to pay.
To: PinnedAndRecessed
When will people see the truth of this matter? the only ones who will have to suffer are the CHILDREN! Why should children suffer for the sake of the perverts?
10 posted on
08/25/2004 10:01:11 AM PDT by
DirtyHarryY2K
(G W B 2004! Friends Don't Let Friends Vote For DemocRATS)
To: PinnedAndRecessed
So the court admits there is a difference after all.
12 posted on
08/25/2004 10:07:44 AM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: PinnedAndRecessed
This judge's name needs to be placed next to the word "Hypocrite" in Webster's. Based on case law now, there's a whole lotta people who should contact their attorneys.
13 posted on
08/25/2004 10:10:28 AM PDT by
blackdog
(Hell is an endless hayfield needing to be raked, baled, and put up.)
To: PinnedAndRecessed
What these people need to realize, and us people need to enforce, is that they cannot just get their "rights" and not have to deal with the consequences of their decisions. What is the Mass. Supreme court doing? This has got to be one of the most blatant homo. agenda and idiotic sets of rulings I have ever seen! Rediculous!
16 posted on
08/25/2004 10:19:38 AM PDT by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: PinnedAndRecessed
Court bias bump.
LBT
-=-=-
17 posted on
08/25/2004 10:20:20 AM PDT by
LiberalBassTurds
(Al Qaeda needs to know we are fluent in the "dialogue of bullets.")
To: PinnedAndRecessed
Some animals are more equal than others.
18 posted on
08/25/2004 10:20:56 AM PDT by
spodefly
(I have posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
To: Happy2BMe; glock rocks
Un-(appropriate expletive deleted)-believable! Actually, it is believable in today's American legal system.
22 posted on
08/25/2004 10:39:03 AM PDT by
B4Ranch
(Don't be so open minded that Your Brains Fall Out--Respect shouldn't be given, It Must Be Earned)
To: PinnedAndRecessed
Can you say "sex discrimination"?
To: PinnedAndRecessed
Aside from the technical legal aspects of the case, the silver lining is that the child has slightly more hope of being normal, now that it's not going to be raised in "I have two mommies!" perversion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson