Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spokeshave
Right on...I believe they were called "Widow Makers" apparently very twitchy to fly.

It wasn't all that bad. But any single-engine fighter of the period was risky business. I think "Widowmaker" applied more to the F-104 in NATO service.

The only allies that flew the -102 were Greece and Turkey. Under 900 total of the F-102s were built. Almost 300 of them went on to be expended as targets, so no more than 600 of them could have been losses for all reasons (including maintenance downs). About a dozen were lost in Vietnam, maybe 20 -- most in accidents or destroyed on the ground by mortars.

A pretty horrible record for today, but typical for the Century Series. Over half of 104s crashed, over half of 105s were combat losses.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

229 posted on 08/21/2004 5:19:35 PM PDT by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: Criminal Number 18F

bttt


234 posted on 08/21/2004 6:12:35 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

To: Criminal Number 18F

I think several were also used late in their career as stand in for Soviet fighters in dissimilar combat training.

102 and 104 both suffered greatly by use in roles they were NEVER intended to fit into.


235 posted on 08/21/2004 6:23:27 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson