[Paul8148]

I think they should of stayed with this stuff and not with the Kerry said, they said vet stuff. They have proof here.

[votelife]

I think the first ad was part of an effort to get visibility. In any campaign, you save you biggest stuff for last. Which means, Kerry better watch out!

[Chaguito]

The response will be, "It's 30 years old, why dredge up the past," along with handful after handful of doodoo to smear the vets. Kerry will fall back on his "Unfortunate youthful overenthusiasm." The NYT will carry his water. Many more papers will ride on the back of NYT. But it won't work.

[kabar]

I think they should of stayed with this stuff and not with the Kerry said, they said vet stuff. They have proof here.

It all fits together. Kerry was lying about his military service and lied about the men he served with. It is not "Kerry said, they said." There are facts to support the SBVFT. Unfit for Command combines both Kerry's military service and antiwar activities. It shows what a fraud this guy really is. I expect the next ad to deal with Kerry's impact on the people of Vietnam and the results of the Communist takeover of the South, which Kerry advocated. That should play well in California with its almost 500,000 Vietnamese immigrant population.

[palmer]

I agree with you (stick with one topic). The Kerry camp already has their answer sent yesterday in their email to supporters. It's that the Lied About Bronze Star campaign has ended officially yesterday with the main witness being "completely discredited" by the WashPost article. Now they will say since that didn't work, the Swifties are starting a brand new campaign.

I sent my $25 last night, but I'm just relating what the spin is already.