[RetiredArmy]

But, remember, Kerry has no agenda except he could "do it better, faster, and with less spending, while taxing the evil rich more to fund his socialist programs." Other than that, he has no agenda. No record in the senate. He is running on four months spent in Vietnam over 35 years ago. That is his record of service. 4 FREAKING MONTHS!

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

No record in the senate. He is running on four months spent in Vietnam over 35 years ago. That is his record of service. 4 FREAKING MONTHS!

... excluding, of course, the several decades he spent in Cambodia, developing their written language, architecture and dance. :)

[ConservativeStLouisGuy]

EXACTLY! -- four friggin' months and (as you said) nothing else to show in 35 years....gee, I seem to remember "the good old days" (1996 Presidential Election) when one's "military service" DIDN'T matter as....well....Klintoon was running for pres at that time, DIDN'T have any "military service" and the press made NO BIG DEAL of that fact....funny how things have changed in this election:

BOTH W and Lurch have at least SOME "military service", but (of course) Lurch's "military service" is more "important" than W's as without it (or "embellishing it") Lurch would have nothing else to "run on" on this election. As they used to say on Saturday Night Live, "how conveeeeeenient!"