Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GetZarqawiNow
No, if Keyes is running at 40%, I'll vote for him out of party loyalty because he could win.

I can't relate to that particular concept. (Party loyality?,,Kinda like George Ryan?)

Otherwise, I won't vote for him because he's carpetbagging.

I don't have a problem with so called "carpetbagging". The candidate who stands for the same things as I will get my vote regardless of his address.

I do not believe he has a chance in this state.

Right. And neither did any other candidate they had in mind.

What I do have is an opportunity to let the SCC know how I feel about outsourcing the candidacy to somebody from out of state.

Write them a letter.

Voting Libertarian, or showing up to still vote for the president without voting in the Senatorial election allows me to express my disgust with the SCC.

Ummm,,you will be the only one to know what you meant.

Do you know who the Libertarian candidate is?

113 posted on 08/13/2004 12:45:16 PM PDT by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Protagoras
I do not believe he has a chance in this state.

Right. And neither did any other candidate they had in mind.

It seems that the ONLY candidates that many "Republicans" on this site would have supported as the GOP nominee was Obama. He was the ONLY candidate that polls showed had a chance of winning. Should the IL GOP SCC have selected Obama or someone that "had no chance of winning"?

129 posted on 08/13/2004 1:47:07 PM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson