[Modernman]

She was right to defy the judge in this case. The judge ruled that she couldn't engage in an otherwise legal activity.

Doesn't matter. She signed onto the custody agreement and agreed to be bound by it. Violating a court order constitutes contempt of court.

[SheLion]

Doesn't matter. She signed onto the custody agreement and agreed to be bound by it. Violating a court order constitutes contempt of court.

I wonder who "snitched" on her. Were her kids turned into little snitches???

[stylin_geek]

While I deplore what the judge said about second hand smoke in his ruling, I completely agree with the fact she violated the custody agreement.

However, what irritates me to no end is the presumption the women actually smoked in the same room with the children. If the custody agreement is so loosely worded as to use the term "smoking around the children" then she could very well be in trouble because she was where her kids could see her smoking, but not necessarily in the same room with the kids.

[RinaseaofDs]

I didn't disagree. Sometimes it takes getting arrested to change a bad law. The judge is going to have to show cause in a criminal court. It's likely it will be overturned.