Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HipShot
They may intend to absorb damage of their choosing in order to fulfill their greater mission, which is the destruction of Israel.

Astute observation. I concur. Although I would say that were we to pre-emptively strike them first, I doubt it would be a "half measure." Although I don't think we'd be the first to go nuclear, I wouldn't doubt for a moment that the proven-in-Afghanistan "Daisy Cutter" might be on the table for certain missions.

2,793 posted on 08/18/2004 3:49:33 PM PDT by ExSoldier (M1A: Any mission. Any conditions. Any foe. At any range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2791 | View Replies ]


To: ExSoldier
"Although I would say that were we to pre-emptively strike them first, I doubt it would be a "half measure." Although I don't think we'd be the first to go nuclear, I wouldn't doubt for a moment that the proven-in-Afghanistan "Daisy Cutter" might be on the table for certain missions."

That is my biggest concern, ExSoldier. It would not be a "half measure", which makes me wonder of we have track of all their assets. They have something up their sleeve, and I'd give a lot to know what it is, and where it's hidden.
2,794 posted on 08/18/2004 3:54:59 PM PDT by HipShot (EOM couldn't cut the head off a beer with a chainsaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2793 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson