Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson
Hmm... I guess FactCheck could be considered a tertiary source ...It's easy to imagine FactCheck being subtitled A Cyberspace-Almanac for Lazy Journalists

From University of Maryland Library

Primary Sources

Primary sources are original materials. They are from the time period involved and have not been filtered through interpretation.

Secondary Sources

Secondary sources are accounts written after the fact with the benefit of hindsight. They are interpretations and evaluations of primary sources. Secondary sources are not evidence, but rather commentary on and discussion of evidence.

Tertiary Sources

Tertiary sources consist of information which is a distillation and collection of primary and secondary sources.
105 posted on 08/15/2004 7:52:13 AM PDT by syriacus (Benedict Arnold REALLY was a war hero ----- before he was a traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: syriacus

By your definition it is not even tertiary. It is just liberal opinionating (if that is even a legitimate word).


106 posted on 08/15/2004 7:55:12 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson