To: Claire Voyant
I'm listening to Medved too. If I understand this guy correctly Kerry did save the guy but then ran leaving others in the water under fire. Oh, that is great. Can you get that to Hannity?
172 posted on
08/05/2004 12:29:10 PM PDT by
no dems
(Ignorance is "bliss"; and every Democrat I know is "bliss-tered".)
To: no dems
OOPS!! Wrong copy. This is what I meant to reply to: "Bring it on"....Now.."TAKE IT BACK...or we will sue"!!! Sorry Clair Voyant.
191 posted on
08/05/2004 12:32:44 PM PDT by
no dems
(Ignorance is "bliss"; and every Democrat I know is "bliss-tered".)
To: no dems
Medved is getting a lot of good info from Odell about what actually went on over there. According to the official report Kerry wrote they had to run 3.2 miles of hostile fire to affect the rescue. 3.2 miles of fire would require 1000's of bad guys. I flew in that area and although there were a lot of them there never were 1000's lined along a riverbank at any time.
196 posted on
08/05/2004 12:33:19 PM PDT by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: no dems
Well, if the guy on Medved is saying Kerry sped away while under fire, that contradicts another of the swifties this morning on with Eric Hogue on KTKZ in Sacramento. He said that one of the swift boats hit a mine, and other boats picked up those blown from that boat, but that Kerry did turn around to pick up the fellow who fell off of his boat, but THERE WAS NO FIRE COMING FROM THE SHORE. The boats were NOT under fire, according to the guy I heard interviewed this morning.
520 posted on
08/05/2004 1:59:28 PM PDT by
My2Cents
(http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson