[TN4Liberty]

I've been at this a while, at least scanning comments. You have it pretty well pegged. Insightful comments from Freepers are ignored, with only some occasional minor point of information being debated in any way.

JimRob says this isn't a debating society for liberals to come and defend their points of view. I think this is why. There really isn't much value in this, and the writer is frankly so far behind the curve on what conservatism is and isn't, that it would take him months to catch up with even a newbie. And even then, only if he wanted to learn.

Tell a lie, throw out an accusation, move on to the next lie. Each evaluation done without regard to the larger context of history. It is what passes for discussion among liberals.

Ah well...

[Indy Pendance]

I think Jim is not wanting the vitriol of the usual troll. Give credit where credit is due, this lib didn't throw out the usual insults. He still had no substance, thus, cementing the fact they have no basis for their arguments other than their lose of power and abb (anyone but bush) mantra. Basic simple questions about what constitutes a liberal were not answered.

[cake_crumb]

"JimRob says this isn't a debating society for liberals to come and defend their points of view. I think this is why. There really isn't much value in this, and the writer is frankly so far behind the curve on what conservatism is and isn't, that it would take him months to catch up with even a newbie."

LOL...you're right. We sure didn't learn anything or even satisfy the morbid curiosity which brought at least some of us to this thread to begin with.