Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ready to rumble? Village Voice Author, Rick Perlstein, Here to Debate the Freeper Horde
08/03/2004 | Rick Perlstein

Posted on 08/03/2004 12:09:31 PM PDT by dead

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980 ... 1,041-1,051 next last
To: MoJo2001

DEEP BOW!


941 posted on 08/03/2004 9:35:16 PM PDT by Humidston (Bush/Rice - 2004 - You heard it here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: Big Giant Head

I just got home from the bar and checked to see if he provided any cogent replies to my questions. He didnt.


942 posted on 08/03/2004 9:39:36 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

I have conducted an indepth review and analysis of this entire thread; and can without any hestitation render a final score as follows:

Perlstein: minus 27

FReepers: 438 kabazillion

Thanks for playing.

RD


943 posted on 08/03/2004 10:32:32 PM PDT by reagandemocrat (buy "W" ketchup, it's made in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

Thorough! Nice job.


944 posted on 08/03/2004 10:43:57 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

bttt.


945 posted on 08/03/2004 10:55:31 PM PDT by Dec31,1999 (www.protestwarrior.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; dead; Perlstein; shaggy eel; MeekOneGOP

<< In Perlstein's article on people who love Bush, I wondered why he painted conservatives/Republicans as people who change the subject if they don't have a good answer, when that's exactly what liberals/Democrats do. >>

[Psycho?]Pathological Projection Syndrome is the definitive sypmtom of the Liberal Psychosis and is suffered by every "Democrat."

That is, by all too stupid to know they are being lied to and/or too mean-spirited and/or greedy to care -- by those who comprise the bottom half of the wrong side of the Bell Curve [AKA "The 'Democrats'' base"] -- and by those gangsters [AKA "DemocRAT" politicians] who comprise the vast organized-criminal enterprizes we euphamistically and generously know as the "'DemocRAT' party" -- and who, consequential to a cynical "career" choice, lie for a "living."

[Psycho?]Pathological Projection Syndrome is also demonstrated by all who comprise the so-called "mainstream media" [Also -- and less generously, perhaps, known as the Verbalized-Bowel-Bubbles and Bloviators Brigades.

Another sure giveaway of those whose political platform is constructed and stands upon the position that it is "law" and not crime if the gang is large enough that steals and confiscates the wealth of those who create it and squanders it to buy the favor and the votes of those parasites who would so elect them to power -- and uses it also to enrichen themselves and their patrons, intimates, enablers and facilitators -- is that they never call a spade a spade. Apart, that is, from being skilled looters, liars and thieves -- they are adept only at inventing the appearance of "good motive" to cover up their evil intent."

None of their "elected" has ever had a real job or met a non-public-purse payroll and in our still somewhat, thank God, FRee Republic, they are successful only to the extent they can sell their lies to sufficient numbers and/or perpetrate sufficient massive electoral fraud to "elect" themselves to the offices they would never attain on the merits of the truth about themselves, their lack of any recognizable talent, creativity, innovation, productivity and/or industry -- or upon the Truth as to their actual intententions.

Kerry and his trial-liar running mate, lacking on the one hand the ability to lie convincingly -- and on the other the ability to lie convincingly to an audience as smart as is the American electorate -- are doomed to fail.

Especially given that Attorney-General Ashcroft's men are aggressively identifying and eliminating the mass-electoral frauds by way of which the appearance of support for "Democrats" and the outcome of elections are often altered, this year United States of America's President and Armed-Forces Commander-In-Chief, George Walker Bush, will win by a larger than 10% margin and by an Electoral College-dictated minimum 44 States to a maximum 6, plus DC.

Best ones -- Brian

BUMPping


946 posted on 08/03/2004 11:10:44 PM PDT by Brian Allen (I am, thank God, a hyphenated American -- An AMERICAN-American -- and A Dollar-a-Day FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Perlstein

So, why would you care if we "like and trust" a man? Are we never to appreciate a person that has the same values we do?

Does this mean you don't trust or like any of the liberals?

President Bush is the first president I have felt held the same values as I do. I see honesty where liberals see fraud, corruption. Therefore, I fully trust the man with my country. Now, no amount of lies and distortions from the left depicting all the supposed flaws of this president will change my mind. I understand what the man is about, what he values and I like him.

Get over it. Maybe someday you will like a man who becomes your president and hopefully that man will be honorable - something conservatives expect and demand.


947 posted on 08/03/2004 11:25:32 PM PDT by ClancyJ (Vote for President Bush - It's just not safe to vote Democrat.-a bunch of crooks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: dead
I detected many conservatives beginning to care more about power than principles. The right began to seem less interesting to me--more whiny, more shallow--and, what's more, in what I saw as an uncritical devotion to President Bush, often in retreat from its best insights about human nature.

No Rick, what you are trying to do is spread your misery around as you see your agenda being trampled on by the masses.
948 posted on 08/03/2004 11:32:39 PM PDT by John Lenin (I love the smell of Napalm in the morning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonderama; Perlstein

I'm so late with this comment that it'll be anticlimactic, but....

If somebody the size of Moore was able to "sneak" into Carter's box at the DNC, that doesn't speak well for how the Democrats handle security. ;)


949 posted on 08/04/2004 1:32:12 AM PDT by Fawnn (Canteen wOOhOO Consultant and CookingWithPam.com person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"A sadist says "no" when he/she knows that it will bring "torture" to the masochist by denying him/her pain."

Ah ha! Now I am on the right page.

I was lost for a while. ;)

950 posted on 08/04/2004 2:10:03 AM PDT by G.Mason (A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: MoJo2001

Hi Sis. Did anyone ever tell you that you are AWESOME? Did Perlstein ever respond to your many questions?


951 posted on 08/04/2004 4:08:38 AM PDT by beachn4fun (NO.....I do not suffer fools gladly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: MoJo2001
Great questions MoJo.

I bet you will get every question answered by Mr. Perlstein. < /heavy sarcasm>

952 posted on 08/04/2004 4:56:02 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The RAT ticket got a lead balloon bounce from their convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]

To: Perlstein

Your post to The IceMan Cometh in post #96... it's not an answer...


953 posted on 08/04/2004 4:57:45 AM PDT by carton253 (All I am and all I have is at the service of my country. General Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
He has seen my posts

Kind of hard to miss.

He just can't think of the Spin yet.

Tonk, did Rick answer any of your posts? Bet he is squirming in his pants after seeing all the truths here. Snicker, snicker!!

954 posted on 08/04/2004 5:01:59 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (The RAT ticket got a lead balloon bounce from their convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

No, he shouldn't. Which question, of course, has absolutely nothin to do with whether or not your METHOD is a constructive way to carry on this sort of thread. That you can't tell the difference between a criticism of your METHOD and and a rejection of your CONTENT simply means you don't belong in this sort of discussion.


955 posted on 08/04/2004 5:09:23 AM PDT by Taliesan (fiction police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
The purpose of the thread is to ask the liberal questions and engage him in debate. Posting cartoons with one sentence, semi-literate, added captions simply is not part of WHAT THIS CONVERSATION WAS INTENDED TO BE. Is that really so hard?

I'm sure arm-pit farts are still funny, too. At certain times.

956 posted on 08/04/2004 5:15:16 AM PDT by Taliesan (fiction police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan
..the purpose of the thread is to ask the liberal questions and engage him in debate...

It never worked that way, bub. Read the thread.

PS if you're this touchy at 5:00AM, what are you gonna be like by the end of the day?

957 posted on 08/04/2004 5:52:02 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 956 | View Replies]

To: dead

It's hard to take this guy seriously when he has typos and gframmar errors in his writing (unless you just re-wrote his stuff, Dead, and accidentally put the typos in yourself).


958 posted on 08/04/2004 5:57:11 AM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie

Well, we can certainly agree it never worked that way. Bub.


959 posted on 08/04/2004 6:00:22 AM PDT by Taliesan (fiction police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 957 | View Replies]

To: Perlstein
RP wrote: "Mr. Sunday's is the first ignorant post. The process whereby people argue to trust our man and not yours is called an "election."

Would you disagree with the statement from many on the right that the Dems election argument against President Bush is based largely on "Our man is not Bush"? That the Dems have given little if any in way of substantive argument for the election of JFKerry? I would go as far to say that a large part of Kerry's campaign has simply been, "I would do the same thing, only better." Seems to me that in the context of that sentiment BSunday's statement about the the left putting their faith in a man, and nothing else, is right on the mark.

960 posted on 08/04/2004 6:04:41 AM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980 ... 1,041-1,051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson