[calif_reaganite]

Unless you have some evidence that the Governor ... not legislative appropriators ... bowed to the influence of the union goonery

As a matter of fact I do. Arnold has line item veto power (Cal. Const. art. 4 sec. 10(e).) He could have taken a stance against the spending lobby and the dems and vetoed this line item, yet he didn't. Explain this away.

[Barlowmaker]

As a matter of fact I do. Arnold has line item veto power (Cal. Const. art. 4 sec. 10(e).) He could have taken a stance against the spending lobby and the dems and vetoed this line item, yet he didn't. Explain this away.

LOL. Okay, now it's that he didn't line item veto a $3.5 million appropriation in an $80 billion budget. That's his "caving". You're incorrigible.

Tilt at your windmills friend. It's a socially accepted - respected - virtue around here.

I really, really wonder what some folks posting here do for a living. I love that Hugh Hewitt always asks that of his contentious callers, because it provides delightful insight to how a person engages themselves economically and how intelligently and consistently they express their interests politically.

I'm not intrigued here on FR by where someone lives, or how old they are ... I'm fascinated by how they make their living. That's the true anonymity of this place.