Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calif_reaganite
As a matter of fact I do. Arnold has line item veto power (Cal. Const. art. 4 sec. 10(e).) He could have taken a stance against the spending lobby and the dems and vetoed this line item, yet he didn't. Explain this away.

LOL. Okay, now it's that he didn't line item veto a $3.5 million appropriation in an $80 billion budget. That's his "caving". You're incorrigible.

Tilt at your windmills friend. It's a socially accepted - respected - virtue around here.

I really, really wonder what some folks posting here do for a living. I love that Hugh Hewitt always asks that of his contentious callers, because it provides delightful insight to how a person engages themselves economically and how intelligently and consistently they express their interests politically.

I'm not intrigued here on FR by where someone lives, or how old they are ... I'm fascinated by how they make their living. That's the true anonymity of this place.

83 posted on 07/31/2004 3:20:39 PM PDT by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Barlowmaker

Yes, this an example of his caving on the budget. This is one of hundreds, if not thousands. You can't seem to explain it away, though, can you?

Lemming-like allegiance is rarely helpful. I'm willing to give Arnold credit for repealing the illegal car tax and pushing through his workers' comp reform. But I will honestly criticize him when he fails to stand up to the spending lobby, as he inexcusably did with this budget.


84 posted on 07/31/2004 3:29:15 PM PDT by calif_reaganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson