1 posted on
07/30/2004 3:58:36 PM PDT by
pookie18
To: pookie18
BWAHAHAHAH!
Oh pookie18, you post such FUNNY STUFF...
...this is a joke, right?
2 posted on
07/30/2004 4:02:33 PM PDT by
locochupacabra
(If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.)
To: pookie18
Let us pray that they decide to throw tons of their own money down this rathole. It will keep them from doing other mischief with it!
3 posted on
07/30/2004 4:05:32 PM PDT by
Doug Loss
To: pookie18
Personally, I could care less what the "Big Media" has to say at all. I watch Brit Hume at the end of the day cause he is a man of honor and his word and so are most of (I said most) the others.
However, I will still always and forever get all my important information from Rush Limbaugh. He doesn't have guests...doesn't pander to anyone and speaks just like I do. He has been attacked over and over again and rises up every time. That's why I have the tagline I do.
4 posted on
07/30/2004 4:06:39 PM PDT by
cubreporter
(-I trust Rush...he will prevail in spite of the naysayers.)
To: pookie18
If the organizers think ABC, CBS, CNN et al are too conservative, you have to wonder just how far out left their proposed new network will be should it ever get off the ground.It will be like Air America. It will barely start getting off the ground, then the checks will start bouncing, and it will fade away.
5 posted on
07/30/2004 4:07:29 PM PDT by
irv
To: MeekOneGOP; mhking
6 posted on
07/30/2004 4:09:36 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: pookie18
So, when will Sandy Burglar finish the investigation of himself?
7 posted on
07/30/2004 4:11:15 PM PDT by
Mark
(Treason doth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
To: pookie18
Well, OK fine... however, they cannot call it the New Media. WE are the new media. They should call it what it is - Pravda.
8 posted on
07/30/2004 4:13:37 PM PDT by
ProfoundMan
(No no - WE"RE the blue states, THEY'RE red !)
To: pookie18
AlGore couldn't help 'em -- NWI carried coverage from CBC & CBC Newsworld...
9 posted on
07/30/2004 4:16:06 PM PDT by
mhking
(John Kerry & Al Gore: Cut from the same tree.)
To: pookie18
Oh, Great!! Now they want to hijack the term "New Media", something that up until now described the Internet.
Other hijacked terms:
Pro-Choice: Euphimism that now means Pro-Abortion.
Progressive: Used to mean forward-thinking. Something the Dims are not.
Gay: Used to mean Happy
(Feel free to list any other terms the lefties hijacked.)
11 posted on
07/30/2004 4:22:07 PM PDT by
peteram
To: pookie18
"The group will then begin to looking for investors."
That's a list I'd like to have. Anyone who is incompetent enough to "invest" in such an ill-fated endeavor doesn't deserve the money anyway. I'll take it.
12 posted on
07/30/2004 4:25:02 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(Let me take yet another opportunity to tell the "moderates" to shove it ....... then twist it.)
To: pookie18; irv; Mark
Editorial standards at the network will be high, he promised............ This is for real................. The liberal activists cited the success of Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" as an indication that the new network could make it. This says it all. They claim they are going to have HIGH STANDARDS, yet they hold Michael Moore's creation of lies as a standard for them!!! Perfect, I have fallen down the rabbit hole!
16 posted on
07/30/2004 4:55:47 PM PDT by
beyond the sea
(Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza)
To: pookie18
Hasn't Err Amerika died already? NOw they want television? LOL That's going to be a whole new level of folding money ;)
17 posted on
07/30/2004 4:55:49 PM PDT by
Libertina
(Photoshop is our friend - just ask John Bunny-Suit Kerry ;))
To: pookie18
If the organizers think ABC, CBS, CNN et al are too conservative, you have to wonder just how far out left their proposed new network will be should it ever get off the ground. It would be so far to the left that, heretofore, only state-sponsored propaganda outlets in communist banana republics could reflect the same sort of derangement.
18 posted on
07/30/2004 4:57:20 PM PDT by
spodefly
(This post meets the minimum daily requirements for cynicism and irony.)
To: pookie18
If you spend any time on the "liberal" boards, you would know that they think that mainstream media is conservative because:
(a) The media is owned by rich white guys, and rich white guys are conservative, so they make their media reflect their personal views, therefore the media are conservative.
(b) All of the media was positive about the Iraqi war in the first days of the invasion, and the invasion of Iraq is a conservative position, therefore the media are conservative.
(c) Most of the media are not openly espousing gay marriage, open borders, the immediate imprisonment of gun owners, and raising the tax rates to 90% for anyone who works in non-union private industry, therefore the media is conservative.
21 posted on
07/30/2004 5:40:16 PM PDT by
dark_lord
(DemonRat Political Platform: (1) Death to America (2) Up with Treason)
To: pookie18
WE NEED FREEP TV!!!!!
How great would that be??
I WANT MY FREEP TV!!!!!!
To: pookie18
Actually, I think this is a great idea. Liberals think that everyone else agrees with them and are shocked to find out that most people don't. I want liberals to let it all hang out so that everyone will see them for what they are.
Their typical left-wing hatefests will send most people running to the Republican party.
To: pookie18
what are they talking about, Free Speech TV is on the air and it is NOTHING BUT leftist commie drivel.
It is anti-christian, pro homosexual, anti-capitalist, pro commie pablum.
To: pookie18
One other issue to support the left's desire.
the alphabets and cnn and bbc have to PRETEND to be unbiased and on occasion will admit to eating crow.
A dedicated leftist network would have no need for pretense and they could spin spin spin spin.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson