Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archives Denies Report That Berger Is in the Clear
NewsMax .com | 7/30/04 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 07/30/2004 11:10:27 AM PDT by kattracks

A senior spokeswoman for the National Archives denied a report Friday morning that Archives officials have cleared former Kerry-Edwards campaign adviser Sandy Berger on charges that he withheld documents from the 9/11 Commission.

"In spite of what the Wall Street Journal said, the National Archives really isn't commenting on this case because it's under investigation," Susan Cooper, chief spokeswoman for the Archives, told NewsMax.com. The Journal reported in Friday editions:

"Officials looking into the removal of classified documents from the National Archives by former Clinton National Security Advisor Samuel Berger say no original materials are missing and nothing Mr. Berger reviewed was withheld from the commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. ... The conclusion by Archives officials and others would seem to lay to rest the issue of whether any information was permanently destroyed or withheld from the commission."

The Journal report was picked up by ABC Radio network news, which further misreported the story by saying that the Justice Department had cleared Sandy Berger of all charges.

But Ms. Cooper disputed the claim that she or any other Archives official had said any such thing.

"We really have had nothing to say and will continue to have nothing to say about the particulars of the [Berger] case," Cooper told NewsMax. "I gather that there's somebody else in the food chain that has been talking about the case but it's not at the Archives."

In keeping with her no-comment policy, the Archives chief spokeswoman declined to confirm an earlier Washington Post report that Berger had destroyed four of the six copies of the Millennium Plot After Action Review stored in Archives files.

Cooper also declined to say whether draft copies of the document with original notes in the margins were among the papers Berger's lawyer Lanny Breuer said his client had "discarded."



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nara; sandyberger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: kattracks
Why the apparent miss direction by the WSJ???

I posted a thread on Thursday that illustrates how classified is supposed to be handled. The title of the thread is Details of Classified Document Handling Procedures.

bout "honest mistakes" vs premeditation. If you have already read this, please ignore.

The thread can be found here.
21 posted on 07/30/2004 12:14:35 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

The Journal story was written by Scott Paltrow, it appears on pg A6, the telephone number is 212 416 2500. Give him a call and ask him to clarify is article.


22 posted on 07/30/2004 12:19:20 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Has this shown up anywhere else? I have some lib friends who will not accept NewsMax as a source for *anything*


23 posted on 07/30/2004 12:24:15 PM PDT by smc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smc
Has this shown up anywhere else? I have some lib friends who will not accept NewsMax as a source for *anything*

You can tell your liberal friends that NewsMax's quotes of Archives spokeswoman Susan Cooper were based on a tape recorded telephone interview Friday morning.

24 posted on 07/30/2004 12:31:14 PM PDT by Carl/NewsMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
"so he INADVERTENTLY took them again"

We are not allowed to post an article from this source, but maybe Sandy was fishing for a lot more then we now think.
John Kerry Comunist Connections

25 posted on 07/30/2004 12:36:11 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Wow..ask a question and get answer from 'The' Carl :-)

I'm honored by and thankful for the response.


26 posted on 07/30/2004 12:38:19 PM PDT by smc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Sandy Burglar should be indicted! And that's the bottom line!!!

If he is not & doesn't get on orange suit you can kiss your government good-by. I'm on the fence here. I wonder what the Vegas odds are. 50-50?

27 posted on 07/30/2004 12:55:17 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Robert Taylor
>>The timing of this story is suspect.

The timing, and the content too! This is Democrat skullduggery, to be sure. The Bush administration must not allow such things to stand unchallenged and unrefuted. And in Berger's case, unindicted.

28 posted on 07/30/2004 1:48:17 PM PDT by Graymatter (Countdown---95 more days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Thanks Carl for looking into this. I think the landscape has changed quite a bit since the good old Whitewater days. At that time FreeRepublic was nonexistant. FoxNews was fledgling at best and you and Worldnetdaily were at least in the same boat. Let's give them a run for their money this time around.


29 posted on 07/30/2004 4:03:07 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I am greatly relieved to know that Mr. Berger is still under the lights...what I would like to know, and may have missed it, is..........John Ashcroft mentioned other documents that came to light that he had not been apprised of from Berger (?) when he took office - that those papers were not forth coming. Does anyone know what those papers were?

Freepers, post daily whatever you find about Sandy Berger – this must not be swept under the rug!

30 posted on 07/30/2004 4:47:20 PM PDT by yoe (Bill Clinton lied again to the Nation – his Convention speech was 90% bogus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump


31 posted on 07/30/2004 4:58:55 PM PDT by yellowhammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley; Temple Owl
"This Berger story MUST be kept alive........."

I agree!

32 posted on 07/30/2004 5:01:37 PM PDT by deadhead (God Bless Our Troops and Veterans Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deadhead

I just read the WSJ story and was surprised. I still think he violated laws, but I am willing to wait for more details. If he even took the stuff out of the office without permission, he should be charged and arrested.


33 posted on 07/30/2004 5:20:05 PM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Calling Albert Hunt calling Al Hunt. Hey Al answer your page.


34 posted on 07/30/2004 5:21:29 PM PDT by Datom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger

80 he walks and 20 he gets a talking to, 100 not jail time.


35 posted on 07/30/2004 5:22:06 PM PDT by B4Ranch (----http://www.firearmsid.com/----"Wise men learn more from fools than fools learn from the wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley; kattracks; EternalVigilance; Blake#1; skeeter
This Berger story MUST be kept alive.....

Exactly, EggsAckley! Sandy Pants must go up the river. I still feel he is going to get very depressed within weeks or months. ;-)

The Dems. will blame it on the evil Republicans for driving him to it..... sort of like the newspaper articles depressed Vince Foster.

36 posted on 07/30/2004 5:22:49 PM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Archives Denies Report That Berger Is in the Clear

WARNING. Reading the following comment may cause spewing of liquids on to keyboard and monitor. Please swallow before continuing. No animals were injured in the making of this post. Any similarity to reality is purely coincidental. Any factual statement is not the intent of the poster. Views expressed by the poster are not necessarily shared by the poster. Price is for 24 month lease with $2500 down. Your mileage may vary. Objects are closer than they appear. No shirt, no shoes, no service. You must be at least this tall to ride. Do not remove under penalty of law. Remain seated until the ride comes to a full and complete stop. Reading this post may cause low birth weight. Not recommended for viewers with heart conditions, back or neck injuries, breathing difficulties, recent surgery or illness, high blood pressure and carpal tunnel syndrome.
[Disclaimer courtesy of Conspiracy Guy]



37 posted on 07/30/2004 5:28:53 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

My thoughts exactly.


38 posted on 07/30/2004 5:29:30 PM PDT by bad company ((<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson