Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Havoc
Despite media and leftist propoganda saying otherwise, The President of the United States does not control Chrysler/Delco or any other outsourcing company just like he does not control the economy overall.

We inherited a Recesssion from the Silicon Bubble Birst, 9/11, corporate scandals (all created in the 90's), and had to fight the war on terror. Since then Bush's tax cuts have improved the economy which in turn adds businesses.

I was laid off in 2001 from Circuit City, which I'm sure has opened stores in foreign countries, but I know it wasn't all Bush's fault and I'm not depending soley on him to provide me another job.

5,178 posted on 07/29/2004 10:20:15 PM PDT by pulaskibush (Now I know and don't know, and knowing and not knowing is half the battle- GI Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5038 | View Replies ]


To: pulaskibush

I'm not counting on Bush to get me another job. I left Circuit City to come to my current job btw. 2 years and the local store folded up after I left too. It couldn't compete because it's a publicly traded company. As soon as a company sells out to the stock market, employees get the crap end until a business folds up because it can't maintain ever rising kickbacks to the stockholders and won't give raises for fear that the stock price will be affected.. etc. Corporate mentality, make the company money, make the stock maker money, but ever increasing pressure on the employees till you burn them up, get rid of them and bring in new ones to exploit till they've had enough... Business ethics. Welcome to Corporate America.

I had a good job and was doing fine. Bush doesn't control companies. He affects trade policy which in turn sets the standard for what companies can get by with doing - in this case, outsourcing. If you're looking for a way to allow the president to dodge responsibility for his policies and the affects thereof, you'll get no quarter here. It's his policy and his responsibility. Bill Clinton did not set George Bush's trade policy. George Bush did. Companies reacted based on what the Government told them they could get by with via trade policy.

I had a job that didn't lose to local competition. It didn't become obsolete. My job is being handed to Mexican nationals because they are mexicans with mexican cost of living and a different political system that doesn't give a hoot about rights or ethical considerations. My job still exists. American companies just decided that since policy says they can do it, they'll put americans out of work, exploit people in other lands and reimport their services for american dollars.. bypassing most of the rules of our marketplace and legal system, our rights, etc. Freedom loving capitalists who don't like the cost of working in a free country selling us out to exploit our neighbors ain't a good thing.


5,195 posted on 07/29/2004 10:44:30 PM PDT by Havoc (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5178 | View Replies ]

To: pulaskibush
Why is it fine for Heinz Corp to outsource 57 factories but not ok for any other companies? Who says Heinz reasons are not the same as other companies?

Pray for W and Our Troops

5,196 posted on 07/29/2004 10:49:15 PM PDT by bray (Yaaaawn Tax , Tax , Tax & Kerry wants your paycheck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson