Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man wins Hoosier Lotto jackpot two days after divorce from cheating wife finalized -
Hoosier Gazette ^ | July 25, 2004 | Ben Jennings

Posted on 07/26/2004 10:37:17 AM PDT by UnklGene

Man wins Hoosier Lotto jackpot two days after divorce from cheating wife finalized -

By Ben Jennings, THG News

July 25, 2004

Until last Saturday, 2004 had been the worst year of Randy Fletcher’s life.

On a cold mid-January day, the 29 year old Brownstown resident took a half-day off of work due to a severe case of diarrhea, only to find his wife of four years, Tara, in bed with a neighbor.

Two months later, he wrecked his mint-condition 1956 Chevy that he had spent three years carefully restoring when a deer ran out in front of him.

May brought even more heartache; Fletcher’s 12 year-old German Shepherd Molly was diagnosed with cancer and had to be put to sleep.

Fletcher, who works as a union electrician, felt that his life was cursed after losing his house and most of his life savings in the divorce proceedings that were finalized on July 15.

That is until July 17, when his life changed forever. Fletcher purchased five dollars worth of Hoosier Lottery computer picks for that night’s drawing, like he had done every Wednesday and Saturday for the past several years.

When he checked his ticket numbers against those in the Sunday Indianapolis Star, he had to do a double take—the third row of numbers on his ticket matched those in the newspaper: 5-15-27-37-39-46!

Randy Fletcher had just won the $1 million jackpot.

“I was in complete shock for several hours,” said Fletcher, “It took me several minutes to catch my breath. It was the most unbelievable and amazing feeling I have ever had, especially after all that had happened this year.”

Fletcher says he plans to use the approximately $289,000 he will be taking home after accepting the cash option and paying federal, state, and local taxes to get back on his feet. “I am going to buy a new house, probably get Harley, and a new puppy, probably another (German) Shepherd. Get a whole new fresh start on life. I also want to head to Cancun for a few days this winter.”

The life of Randy Fletcher is a prime example of how every cloud has a silver lining. When asked what advice he has for anyone else whose life is in shambles, Fletcher advises, “Just keep plugging away. Sooner or later things will look up. I am a prime example of that.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: jackpot; lottery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: Principled

I read the post that he lost the house, everything. Go figure.


81 posted on 07/26/2004 12:39:43 PM PDT by Kackikat (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: krb

It says he "lost the house", so either it was repossed or she got it.


82 posted on 07/26/2004 12:41:11 PM PDT by Kackikat (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: krb
Because of the rule of deep pockets.

The one with the deep pockets gets screwed every time.

Especially if he's also guilty of being male.
83 posted on 07/26/2004 12:42:28 PM PDT by null and void (Nurieek, rotut, hernunger...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
So is wealth more important than a faithful wife, a great antique car and a devoted pet?

Wealth can buy the latter two, and he never had the first one to begin with.

84 posted on 07/26/2004 12:44:24 PM PDT by Sloth (We have to support RINOs like Specter; their states are too liberal to elect someone like Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: null and void

So if the husband is a working guy, and the wife is not a working person, she can nail the neighbor, and if they split up, he still has to pay extra money for her, even if there are no kids?


85 posted on 07/26/2004 12:44:37 PM PDT by krb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: krb

Folks, folks, the story is NOT REAL. You're arguing about something that DID NOT happen.


86 posted on 07/26/2004 12:50:02 PM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Gone GF

Seems to me that the topic that I am now talking about is very real to some of the people responding to me. You'd have to argue that with them.


87 posted on 07/26/2004 12:51:29 PM PDT by krb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: krb
Yup.

Except if she gets knocked up by the milkman, and he has the DNA evidence, and a video tape of the knocking up, he still gets to pay child support.

The legal presumption is any child born in the marriage is his.

Oh, and as a special bonus - she doesn't have to spend one dime of the child support on the kid.

I'm not the only dad who's ex is impeccably dressed, while my son is in either rags, hand-me-downs, or clothes I bought. (Although that has improved since I pointed it out to him, and he wanted to know why that was. Ask your mom...)
88 posted on 07/26/2004 12:52:22 PM PDT by null and void (Nurieek, rotut, hernunger...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
TIMING IS EVERYTHING!
89 posted on 07/26/2004 12:53:41 PM PDT by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
"Fletcher says he plans to use the approximately $289,000 he will be taking home after accepting the cash option and paying federal, state, and local taxes..."

I find this part supremely sad. Million bucks.....and pockets WELL under a third of it when all is said and done.

90 posted on 07/26/2004 12:56:20 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gone GF

The Candadian Press has picked up this story as News.http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1089499332278_35/?hub=Canada


91 posted on 07/26/2004 12:56:37 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Former fetus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: highnoon
Twenty bucks says that some liberal circuit court will find some way to give her a part (most) of the money for some riduculous reason or another

A great reason to live off shore for a bit

92 posted on 07/26/2004 1:02:56 PM PDT by SERE_DOC ("9 out of the 10 voices in my head told me to go home & clean my weapons!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wumpus Hunter
Most lotteries only pay 40-50% on the cash option because they fund the payout over time by purchasing an annuity with an embedded interest rate in it, so the present value is much less.

So, if this were a real story, take $1 million x .4 = $400,000 x .6 (federal and state taxes) = $240,000.

Sure, you can say the guy is still way ahead. But consider that the lotteries use the inflated numbers to get mostly working people to pay what is basically a regressive tax. And also consider that if someone on Wall Street pulled a scam like this they'd be doing a whole lot more time than Martha Stewart.

93 posted on 07/26/2004 1:04:22 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ItsBacon
Uh, this isn't real.

I checked the Hoosier Lottery site. The winning numbers are correct and the estimated jackpot for the 17th was indeed $1 million. But the site lists only winners that appear for their "Millionare" game show, not drawing winners.
So who knows?

94 posted on 07/26/2004 1:33:35 PM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gone GF

We know, but like a good fictional story, it highlights an underlying reality.


95 posted on 07/26/2004 2:08:55 PM PDT by null and void (Nurieek, rotut, hernunger...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene

$289K out of a million dollar prize! That is a crime!!


96 posted on 07/26/2004 2:51:53 PM PDT by CharlieOK1 (Funny how Vietnam vets are 'baby killers' and pro-aborts are 'defenders of women')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krb

Sure...don't expect men to be treated fairly and you will be fine...even if your wife is a cheating tramp.


97 posted on 07/26/2004 9:37:23 PM PDT by Keith (IT"S ABOUT THE JUDGES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I'd argue we're better off blasting real-life cases than throwing brickbats at fake ones.


98 posted on 07/27/2004 6:41:13 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Gone GF
Perhaps.

OTOH, one could argue that we're better off only teaching in schools, it's where the teachers are.

A few people who didn't know about the realities of this country's divorce laws now know. This, IHMO, is a good thing. At some point enough people will recognize the underlying insanity of the system, and call for change.

Yeah, right.
99 posted on 07/27/2004 8:02:01 AM PDT by null and void (Nurieek, rotut, hernunger...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Gone GF
Besides, you REALLY don't want the divorced FReepers to get started with their opinions of the process using their own 'real-life' examples.

Trust me!!!
100 posted on 07/27/2004 8:04:38 AM PDT by null and void (Nurieek, rotut, hernunger...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson