Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New bill in House would ban same-sex 'marriage' nationwide
BP NEWS ^ | Jul 23, 2004 | Michael Foust

Posted on 07/25/2004 5:46:56 PM PDT by Dubya

WASHINGTON (BP)--An Oklahoma congressman introduced a bill July 22 that goes a step beyond current law by banning same-sex "marriage" nationwide -- including in Massachusetts -- and unlike a constitutional amendment, requires only a simple majority to pass.

Called the National Marriage Law, the bill, if passed, would supercede state laws, thereby voiding Massachusetts' law legalizing same-sex "marriage." In addition, the law would prevent state courts or lower federal courts from hearing challenges to it. Only the Supreme Court would be able to review it.

Sponsored by Rep. Ernest Istook, R.-Okla., the bill has 37 co-sponsors.

"This is the only [bill] which will stop same-sex marriages from occurring immediately," Micah Swafford, press secretary for Istook, told Baptist Press. "It will supercede state laws."

Under the current federal law called the Defense of Marriage Act, states are allowed to legalize same-sex "marriage, although other states can refuse to recognize those "marriages." DOMA also prevents the federal government from recognizing same-sex "marriage."

Istook's bill goes a step beyond DOMA by protecting the traditional definition of marriage coast to coast.

Swafford said the bill is meant to be a short-term solution until a constitutional marriage amendment can pass. While an amendment requires the support of two-thirds of both the House and Senate, as well as the support of three-fourths of the states, Swafford's bill would need only the support of a simple majority in each chamber. State legislatures would not be involved.

"[Istook] definitely supports a Federal Marriage Amendment," Swafford said. "We believe marriage is important enough ... that it deserves constitutional protection. But we need a backup plan and we need something that takes effect immediately. It's a long process to amend the Constitution and very difficult, and we need a stop-gap measure until we're able to get a constitutional amendment."

By a vote of 233-194, The House passed a bill July 22 that prevents federal courts, including the Supreme Court, from reviewing the Defense of Marriage Act. While that bill prevents federal courts from forcing same-sex "marriage" on the states, it does nothing to prevent a state court from legalizing homosexual "marriage."

"We need a national standard for marriage,” Istook said in a statement. “The institution of marriage is too important to our families and to our society to let a few activist judges control this issue."

Massachusetts' same-sex "marriage" law came following an order by that state's highest court.

Swafford said GOP leaders are "supportive" of Istook’s bill.

"There's a lot of people out there who feel that we need to do whatever we can to protect marriage," she said.

There is precedence for national laws pre-empting state laws, Istook says.

"For example, Congress outlawed polygamy and the Supreme Court upheld Congress’ power to do so," a statement from his office reads. "Federal statute preempts most state laws under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, and states are prohibited from enacting laws, constitutions or other provisions that are inconsistent with the federal statute. This applies but is not limited to issues such as consumer leases, credit billing, hazardous substances, motor vehicle safety, traffic safety, and over-the counter drugs."

The first sentence of the Istook bill is identical to the first sentence of the Federal Marriage Amendment: "Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman."

The bill is HR 4892. --30-- For more information about the national debate over same-sex "marriage," visit http://www.bpnews.net/samesexmarriage


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fma; homosexualagenda; hr4892; istook; protectmarriage; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: asmith92008
"If society has no standards, we cease to be a society."

Yes, very true. And our founding fathers recognized that their experiment in liberty could not work if the people were not virtuous.

Are we to the point of so little virtue that our constitution, and the experiment in liberty, must be abandonded?

61 posted on 07/26/2004 11:33:36 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
More idiotic posturing that's likely to do nothing but derail support for the bill to limit judicial meddling.
62 posted on 07/26/2004 3:09:27 PM PDT by inquest (Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
This is ridiculous. The federal government is not Constitutionally authorized to control state marriage laws, desperate cries to the contrary notwithstanding.
63 posted on 07/26/2004 7:01:06 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
I hope not. I don't think the Constitution is incompatible with liberty. Unelected judges, amending the Constitution without care, on the other hand, is the worst domestic threat our nation has ever faced.
64 posted on 07/29/2004 8:52:52 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
I've been away for a while, so I'll be commenting to both of your comments.

1. Family is the basic building block of society. It is wear values are inculcated to children. If we have anarchic families, as our society has been sliding towards, we will have an anarchic society. I find it no coincidence that we have seen corruption at the highest levels in government, religion, business and sports as we witness the first generation of the post-nuclear family taking the reins of power. Society has a responsibility to encourage traditional, stable families if it wishes to survive.

2. As to the Romans, it is probably true that unchecked immigration helped to kill the Roman Empire as surely as its moral decline. Yet the softness that led the Romans to welcome invasion came from their moral downfall. We witness the same process today in America and it is truly frightening.
65 posted on 07/29/2004 9:12:51 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
How do you propose to deal with the Full Faith and Credit clause?
66 posted on 07/29/2004 10:51:36 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dubya

I wonder if Mr. Kerry will show up for the vote...


67 posted on 07/29/2004 10:56:17 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asmith92008

Without our Constitution, there is no liberty, IMO.
Yes, agree with you completely about the judges. Some of them believe in the "rule of men" instead of the "rule of law."


68 posted on 07/31/2004 12:00:08 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson