To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
PINGPlease let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
2 posted on
07/22/2004 3:46:26 PM PDT by
cpforlife.org
(Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.)
To: cpforlife.org
Maybe she should have her tubes tied now (or use birth control).
To: cpforlife.org
maybe there's a job for that Professor Singer wacko up in Canada.we could export one of our nuts since they sent us
Michael Moore.
4 posted on
07/22/2004 3:50:47 PM PDT by
Rakkasan1
(Justice of the Piece-leaks to China,shills for France,what's in that guy's undapants?)
To: cpforlife.org
Was the child okay after the botched abortion or isn't that important. It looks like it's all about the abortion not done properly and a "mother" making money off of it.
5 posted on
07/22/2004 3:50:49 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
http://vividology.com/rightchoice/
6 posted on
07/22/2004 3:51:58 PM PDT by
cpforlife.org
(Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.)
To: cpforlife.org
I guess some women were born to breed.
9 posted on
07/22/2004 3:55:39 PM PDT by
randog
To: cpforlife.org
What happened to adoption?
10 posted on
07/22/2004 3:56:31 PM PDT by
cyborg
(http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
To: All
He said the woman would have "the joy she derives from the presence of this child in her life."
This is outrageous! Why is this heathen being allowed to keep and raise this child in her GOD-less household? Once a child killer - always a child killer. If I lived in Canada I'd be protesting outside of her house.
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
29 posted on
07/22/2004 7:22:47 PM PDT by
Coleus
(Abraham Lincoln was a trial lawyer.)
To: cpforlife.org
Judge Glen Parrett decided in the woman's favor and awarded her $55,000 in damages and for "emotional turmoil." He also awarded her an additional $5,000 for loss of income as a result of taking time of from work for the birth of the baby. The CBC reported that Judge Parrett turned down her request for compensation for the baby's upbringing. He said the woman would have "the joy she derives from the presence of this child in her life." I guess even judges have their limits.
Disgusting.
34 posted on
07/23/2004 6:24:50 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: cpforlife.org
A few things:
1. No mention of the father. Big surprise there.
2. How far along was the pregnancy when they tried to kill it? She waited three months before going back to say, "hey doc, you missed?" Hmmm...
3. The judge denied compensation for upbringing based on "the joy she derives from the presence of this child in her life." As usual, pro-aborts are unable to see even the most grotesque illogic in their get-rid-of-em beliefs.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson