Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cpforlife.org

Maybe she should have her tubes tied now (or use birth control).


3 posted on 07/22/2004 3:48:48 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: janetgreen

You must have missed the part about the abortionist doing the abortion without removing her IUD....


In all seriousness, this DR. should be barred from ever practicing medicine again - what an idiot (but I'm grateful he was unsuccessful in murdering that baby!).

And I have NO sympathy whatsoever for the woman. If I were the judge, I would have yanked the Dr.'s license to practice, but awarded the woman ZERO - Then again, that may be why I'm not a judge!


13 posted on 07/22/2004 3:58:56 PM PDT by TheBattman (The failure to defend the "traditional" family unit will ultimately be the beginning of the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: janetgreen

>>In 1996, she discovered she was pregnant, despite using birth control.


15 posted on 07/22/2004 4:00:11 PM PDT by InsensitiveConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: janetgreen

She was using birth control, she had an IUD.
An IUD is an "intra-uterine device", a small device that sits just inside the uterus and interferes with fertilization. This doctor was certainly a quack to not know (or care) she had one.


18 posted on 07/22/2004 4:08:51 PM PDT by visualops
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson