Posted on 07/12/2004 3:34:19 PM PDT by blam
I have a lot of respect for this guy. It was his voice and the weight and prestige of the Smithsonian Institute that kept the Indians from Re-burying the bones of Kennewick Man before they could be studied.
This poor kid was worked to death.
My son played the part of Oliver in his HS play of the same title.
All the more reason why people should be well pleased about living in ths country today..
Fascinating story. Poor kid had a hard life.
It's amazing any indentured servants survived. What rough lives they led.
That's a lot of dental decay.
For those who came here in the early 1600's and after, life was indeed hard. Not just on indentured servants. The majority of the settlers died in their first year here. This boy whoever he was, had TB he was not going to live! Everybody had a hard life at that time, and how can that time be equated to just indentured servants that had a hard time and were mistreated.
Often there were no options for these souls, indentured or not! He was most certainly an orhan for whom no one cared. He needed medicine that was not available. He undoubtedly, like many of his contemporaries, had a poor diet. He never would have gotten any taller. He was one of lifes tragedies but in history there are many, as now in South Africa. Where their lives are a living hell. How many years after this boys sad life?
I am the descendant of an indentured servant (read SLAVE) sent to the "new world" (Barbados) as a prisoner after participating in one of the Scottish "jacobite" rebellions against English tyranny.
he somehow (mysteriously) got away from Barbados and worked his way up to the mid-Atlintic colonies. He became a surveyor and surveyed what is now Maryland, West Virginia and many other areas. He bacame the right hand to Lord Baltimore and was granted much land of his own (including all of what is now Washington, D.C.).
The life of an indentured servant (or slave) was harsh, but not all of them died in this manner. There are plenty of stories like my ancestors. There are plenty of stories of freed slaves (living well in the South, of all places) that put the lie to the propoganda being pushed by the intelligentsia. Life was harsh and hard for "free men" at the time as well, let alone their wives and children. Yet they survived, thrived and built a new nation, based on new ideas of liberty that the world had NEVER seen before.
This poor child was grist for that mill. His pain did not go in vain, however small his contribution to the conciousness that led to the founding of our nation. Who knows what minds were affected by his tragedy? Who knows but God? Honor him, do not mourn him. He has gone to a better place.
We all die. It only matters how we act between now and then.
I would think they ALL had a hard life in the 1600's.
Having just had a root canal for a busted tooth, I really feel that kids dental pain.
Poor kid.
Prayers.
Bet he'd laugh himself to death if he heard me complain about my back.
My Daddy claims we are one of the first families of Georgia. Our ancestor came across on the prison ship.
If only Kerry had been President back then, none of this would have happened.
There's some evidence that we may have too. George Oglethorpe's(sp) mission to settle Georgia, I think.
I think he was only kidding but I really do think "Butler" is an old Georgia name and not just because of Rhett.
If you can make the argument that he was an indentured servant, you can tell that he had a hard life, what kind of diet he had, and that he may be representative of certain people of that time," Luckenbach said.
If, but that might not fit the reality of the event.
Convienient but not proven.
Wow. And I can't even get my teenager to clean her own room.
Thanks for pointing that out.
If I remember correctly, one of the reasons the 'Native Americans' wanted to bury the K. man in such a hurry was that they were afraid the forensic investigators would discover what the 'Native Americans' feared they would discover: that the K. man was of Asian heritage, thus disproving that the 'Native Americans' were, in fact, native, and providing greater evidence that 'Native Americans' would be better termed 'Previous Settlers.'
But I'm writing this based upon a couple of articles I read quite a while ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.