Presuming you mean an accurate, non-offensive term, you cant. Israel isnt an issue sufficiently detatched from other issues, other than to those for whom the controversy relates to the faith of Israels residents. If you oppose foreign aid, thats not an Israel issue. Oppose foreign wars, thats not about Israel. Support the Egyptioan-Saudi alliance, thats not about Israel, its pro Arab.
I agree you about neocon, its now morphed to mean a Jew foolish enough to support Republicans. Also not a term worth defining.
Since you bring up neocons, earlier in the thread Ive alluded to Pats memos to Nixon regarding the infeasibility of integration given negros 15 point I-Q deficit. Of course I was accused of making it, but if you believe me (and its easy to verify), Pat wasnt completely certain. Who did he suggest the administration look into the issue?
Irving Kristol. Go figure.
>>>
Presuming you mean an accurate, non-offensive term, you cant.
<<<
"accurate, non-offensive term" ... OK there was just the /tiniest/ bit of mischief in my use of Zio-con. However, I do not see conservative as synonymous with "pro-Israel". I was trying to separate those conservatives for whom Israel is most important and those for whom other issues (e.g. taxes, guns, or abortion) are most important.
This will have to be my last word, it is time for me to go to bed; I have had enough of Pat, hyphenated-cons, and lost "moderate" voters, and I need my sleep.