[Texas Federalist]

Buchanan could recite the constitution and his tone, his manner, his pompous self, the edge of hate in his voice would make it a bad speech.

These unsupported ad hominem attacks on Buchanan are no different than the justification the left uses to attack Bush.

[Howlin]

What makes you think that is unsupported?

I support her view.

[B Knotts]

Yep. You know...I'm no Buchanan fan, nor was I at the time, but...I thought the reaction to his speech was just plain weird. It was a good speech, and he was proven right.

Some people say they don't want to fight a culture war...fine, but realize that one is being waged regardless.

[cajungirl]

see post 101, he said it better than I.

Attacking me wont do anything to advance your cause or your opinion.

There was no "ad hominem" attack. My opinion was based on my personal reaction to that man. He gives me the creeps. His actions as described in post 101 seem to give credence to my reaction to him.

Now he may be your personal hero, but an awful lot of people responded the same way as I did if you remember. Are we all vermin?