Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Domestic Church

whew- so at least we're talking about the 10-15 kiloton ones---not the megablasters


3,088 posted on 07/16/2004 8:19:41 AM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3082 | View Replies ]


To: MamaDearest

MamaDearest---note this

; Sheetz Supplier Investigated (People sick)

Better check on the trucking company that hauled that food!!!


3,093 posted on 07/16/2004 8:21:43 AM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3088 | View Replies ]

To: jerseygirl

10 is bad...I was hoping only 1 or 2....think multiples...there has to be compounded (exponential?) force effects for several set off simultaneously within an area related to spacing and height.


3,099 posted on 07/16/2004 8:25:06 AM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3088 | View Replies ]

To: jerseygirl
"10-15 kiloton ones---not the megablasters..."

That's still about Hiroshima sized. If you're standing near ground zero, I'll bet you won't notice a difference. I'm in sincere doubt that there are any weapons with a yield in the megaton range out there. They're often referred to as "city-busters" and they usually sit atop a MIRV style ICBM. The SADM suitcase type devices are simply perfect for the type of attacks being contemplated by AQ. Frankly they scare me a lot. These could possibly run in excess of 20 KT. That would be pretty bad.

3,154 posted on 07/16/2004 9:48:51 AM PDT by ExSoldier (M1A: Any mission. Any conditions. Any foe. At any range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3088 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson