Skip to comments.
How Many Chemical Weapons Have to be Found Before You Can Say There Are WMDs in Iraq?
White House Press Office ^
| 7/6/2004
| White House Press Office
Posted on 07/06/2004 12:01:48 PM PDT by ConservativeMajority
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: adam_az
hehe, whats relly funny is the liberals had that book banned. so only us conservatives with thoughtful parents know that story. no wonder they never learn :)
To: ConservativeMajority
Q What's the magic number for proclaiming that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? A: The night of the first debate.
22
posted on
07/06/2004 12:48:25 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
To: ConservativeMajority
0.001 gram more than is currently reported as having been found...
To: ConservativeMajority
How Many Chemical Weapons Have to be Found Before You Can Say There Are WMDs in Iraq?
"The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind..."
Hopefully not. But, the left can't afford for WMDs (in small amounts or stockpiles either) to be found and will do everything to cloud the issue.
I, too, would love a "W" surprise in October. (P.S. Happy Birthday, Mr. President!)
24
posted on
07/06/2004 12:54:44 PM PDT
by
hummingbird
("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
To: ConservativeMajority
The only way WMD could ever have been proved to exist and ACKNOWLEDGED by the MSM is for our troops to have been attacked with them and suffered more than ONE casualty. Then they could have said yes there were WMD but WHY were we NOT better prepared to deal with them.
I fervently believe ONLY an attack with WMD in our country or ON OUR TROOPS, will put this topic to rest. I am sure GW would rather be questioned and called a LIAR then for that to happen. Such is the MSM's socialist/marxist agenda.
25
posted on
07/06/2004 12:59:46 PM PDT
by
PISANO
(NEVER FORGET 911 !!!!)
To: Flashman_at_the_charge
You mean a la the 1960's Batman tv series? A villain will have the be pushing the button when he is stoped?
BTW, after the fall of the soviet union, the russians admitted to the illeagal radar at Krasniorsk (sp?) and Sen Biden still denied the radars existance.
To: smonk
"THE PRESENCE OF WMD WILL NOT BE ADMITTED UNTIL AT LEAST THE MIDDLE OF NOVEMBER."Too late to affect the election, which is on November 2, 2004.
BTW, the CAPS LOCK (on) key is not our friend.
27
posted on
07/06/2004 1:05:05 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: ConservativeMajority
That depends on what the meaning of the word "weapon" is, and what the meaning of the word "found" is, etc.
If they unearthed a complete lab with functioning chemical paraphenalia, a nuclear reactor, and a bio-warfare center, the libs would find some way to explain it away to excuse continual attacks on Bush for doing what Clinton should have done.
28
posted on
07/06/2004 1:08:10 PM PDT
by
ZULU
To: Cobra64
oh, man.
the reason that the dems wouldn't admit WMD until after the election should be readily apparent to you.
the caps lock was intended to imitate the feel of a telegraph.
YOU need to polish your sense of humor.
29
posted on
07/06/2004 1:12:23 PM PDT
by
smonk
To: PISANO
ONLY an attack with WMD in our country or ON OUR TROOPS, will put this topic to rest. I am sure [President George W. Bush] would rather be questioned and called a LIAR than for that to happen. Such is the [mainstream media's] socialist/marxist agenda.Their dim imaginations cannot envision someone with enough principle to have that preference.
To: ConservativeMajority
Q What's the magic number for proclaiming that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? One more than will ever be found.
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
To: The Piranha is back
To: MercCPC
WMD was not the only reason given for the war and should not be the only justification after the fact.
34
posted on
07/07/2004 5:02:15 PM PDT
by
CyberCowboy777
(Veritas vos liberabit)
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson