Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Many Chemical Weapons Have to be Found Before You Can Say There Are WMDs in Iraq?
White House Press Office ^ | 7/6/2004 | White House Press Office

Posted on 07/06/2004 12:01:48 PM PDT by ConservativeMajority

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: adam_az

hehe, whats relly funny is the liberals had that book banned. so only us conservatives with thoughtful parents know that story. no wonder they never learn :)


21 posted on 07/06/2004 12:47:34 PM PDT by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
Q What's the magic number for proclaiming that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?

A: The night of the first debate.

22 posted on 07/06/2004 12:48:25 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority

0.001 gram more than is currently reported as having been found...


23 posted on 07/06/2004 12:48:32 PM PDT by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
How Many Chemical Weapons Have to be Found Before You Can Say There Are WMDs in Iraq?

"The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind..."

Hopefully not. But, the left can't afford for WMDs (in small amounts or stockpiles either) to be found and will do everything to cloud the issue.

I, too, would love a "W" surprise in October. (P.S. Happy Birthday, Mr. President!)
24 posted on 07/06/2004 12:54:44 PM PDT by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
The only way WMD could ever have been proved to exist and ACKNOWLEDGED by the MSM is for our troops to have been attacked with them and suffered more than ONE casualty. Then they could have said yes there were WMD but WHY were we NOT better prepared to deal with them.

I fervently believe ONLY an attack with WMD in our country or ON OUR TROOPS, will put this topic to rest. I am sure GW would rather be questioned and called a LIAR then for that to happen. Such is the MSM's socialist/marxist agenda.

25 posted on 07/06/2004 12:59:46 PM PDT by PISANO (NEVER FORGET 911 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flashman_at_the_charge
You mean a la the 1960's Batman tv series? A villain will have the be pushing the button when he is stoped?
BTW, after the fall of the soviet union, the russians admitted to the illeagal radar at Krasniorsk (sp?) and Sen Biden still denied the radars existance.
26 posted on 07/06/2004 12:59:51 PM PDT by The Piranha is back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: smonk
"THE PRESENCE OF WMD WILL NOT BE ADMITTED UNTIL AT LEAST THE MIDDLE OF NOVEMBER."

Too late to affect the election, which is on November 2, 2004.

BTW, the CAPS LOCK (on) key is not our friend.

27 posted on 07/06/2004 1:05:05 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority

That depends on what the meaning of the word "weapon" is, and what the meaning of the word "found" is, etc.

If they unearthed a complete lab with functioning chemical paraphenalia, a nuclear reactor, and a bio-warfare center, the libs would find some way to explain it away to excuse continual attacks on Bush for doing what Clinton should have done.


28 posted on 07/06/2004 1:08:10 PM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
oh, man.

the reason that the dems wouldn't admit WMD until after the election should be readily apparent to you.

the caps lock was intended to imitate the feel of a telegraph.

YOU need to polish your sense of humor.

29 posted on 07/06/2004 1:12:23 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
ONLY an attack with WMD in our country or ON OUR TROOPS, will put this topic to rest. I am sure [President George W. Bush] would rather be questioned and called a LIAR than for that to happen. Such is the [mainstream media's] socialist/marxist agenda.

Their dim imaginations cannot envision someone with enough principle to have that preference.

30 posted on 07/06/2004 1:14:07 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
Q What's the magic number for proclaiming that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?

One more than will ever be found.

31 posted on 07/06/2004 1:16:40 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: The Piranha is back
Looks like they might have something.
WND : Marines find tunnels under nuke complex
33 posted on 07/07/2004 4:55:08 PM PDT by Flashman_at_the_charge (A proud member of the self-preservation society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MercCPC
WMD was not the only reason given for the war and should not be the only justification after the fact.
34 posted on 07/07/2004 5:02:15 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson