Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If D-Day Had Been Reported On Today
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | 6/30/04 | William A. Mayer

Posted on 06/30/2004 3:37:56 AM PDT by kattracks

Tragic French Offensive Stalled on Beaches (Normandy, France - June 6, 1944) - Pandemonium, shock and sheer terror predominate today's events in Europe.

In an as yet unfolding apparent fiasco, Supreme Allied Commander, Gen. Dwight David Eisenhower's troops got a rude awakening this morning at Omaha Beach here in Normandy.

Due to insufficient planning and lack of a workable entrance strategy, soldiers of the 1st and 29th Infantry as well as Army Rangers are now bogged down and sustaining heavy casualties inflicted on them by dug-in insurgent positions located 170 feet above them on cliffs overlooking the beaches which now resemble blood soaked killing fields at the time of this mid-morning filing.

Bodies, parts of bodies, and blood are the order of the day here, the screams of the dying and the stillness of the dead mingle in testament to this terrible event.

Morale can only be described as extremely poor--in some companies all the officers have been either killed or incapacitated, leaving only poorly trained privates to fend for themselves.

Things appear to be going so poorly that Lt. General Omar Bradley has been rumored to be considering breaking off the attack entirely. As we go to press embattled U.S. president Franklin Delano Roosevelt's spokesman has not made himself available for comment at all, fueling fires that something has gone disastrously awry.

The government at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is in a distinct lock-down mode and the Vice President's location is presently and officially undisclosed.

Whether the second in command should have gone into hiding during such a crisis will have to be answered at some future time, but many agree it does not send a good signal.

Miles behind the beaches and adding to the chaos, U.S. Naval gunships have inflicted many friendly fire casualties, as huge high explosive projectiles rain death and destruction on unsuspecting Allied positions. The lack of training of Naval gunners has been called into question numerous times before and today's demonstration seems to underlie those concerns.

At Utah Beach the situation is also grim, elements of the 82nd and 101st Airborne seemed to be in disarray as they missed their primary drop zones behind the area believed to comprise the militant's front lines. Errant paratroopers have been hung up in trees, breaking arms and legs, rendering themselves easy targets for those defending this territory.

On the beach front itself the landing area was missed, catapulting U.S. forces nearly 2,000 yards South of the intended coordinates, thus placing them that much farther away from the German insurgents and unable to direct covering fire or materially add to the operation.

Casualties at day's end are nothing short of horrific; at least 8,000 and possibly as many as 9,000 were wounded in the haphazardly coordinated attack, which seems to have no unifying purpose or intent. Of this number at least 3,000 have been estimated as having been killed, making June 6th by far, the worst single day of the war which has dragged on now--with no exit strategy in sight--as the American economy still struggles to recover from Herbert Hoover's depression and its 25% unemployment.

Military spending has skyrocketed the national debt into uncharted regions, lending another cause for concern. When and if the current hostilities finally end it may take generations for the huge debt to be repaid.

On the planning end of things, experts wonder privately if enough troops were committed to the initial offensive and whether at least another 100,000 troops should have been added to the force structure before such an audacious undertaking. Communication problems also have made their presence felt making that an area for further investigation by the appropriate governmental committees.

On the home front, questions and concern have been voiced. A telephone poll has shown dwindling support for the wheel-chair bound Commander In Chief, which might indicate a further erosion of support for his now three year-old global war.

Of course, the President's precarious health has always been a question. He has just recently recovered from pneumonia and speculation persists whether or not he has sufficient stamina to properly sustain the war effort. This remains a topic of furious discussion among those questioning his competency.

Today's costly and chaotic landing compounds the President's already large credibility problem.

More darkly, this phase of the war, commencing less than six months before the next general election, gives some the impression that Roosevelt may be using this offensive simply as a means to secure re-election in the fall.

Underlining the less than effective Allied attack, German casualties--most of them innocent and hapless conscripts--seem not to be as severe as would be imagined. A German minister who requested anonymity stated categorically that "the aggressors were being driven back into the sea amidst heavy casualties, the German people seek no wider war."

"The news couldn't be better," Adolph Hitler said when he was first informed of the D-Day assault earlier this afternoon.

"As long as they were in Britain we couldn't get at them. Now we have them where we can destroy them."

German minister Goebbels had been told of the Allied airborne landings at 0400 hours.

"Thank God, at last," he said. "This is the final round."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dday; mediabias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 06/30/2004 3:37:56 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

During WW II there were plenty of people who hated or disliked Roosevelt, but they didn't let their antipathy for FDR supercede their love of country and their desire to defeat our enemies. They understood the mission. Today's mainstream opposition are such scoundrels that the love of power overcomes any feelings of patriotism and concern for the nation's safety. Michael Moore would have been thrown in prison or been in danger of being assaulted by patriots if he tried that stuff during WW II. In a free society we will always have treasonous scoundrels like Moore. What we shouldn't have is an opposition party which tries to thwart the president's plan to keep us all safe from Islamo-fascist terrorists by allying with Moore. Moore is a proven enemy of everything the U.S. stands for. Dems ought to be ashamed of themselves for standing with him.


2 posted on 06/30/2004 3:51:14 AM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Don't anyone laugh at this.....I suspect we would have seen it reported this way with today's media.


3 posted on 06/30/2004 3:56:52 AM PDT by Dog (In Memory of Pat Tillman ---- ---- ---- American Hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Tokyo Rose working for the lamestream media.
4 posted on 06/30/2004 3:59:05 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Turn on the tv right now ...and you have US cable networks doing fluff pieces on terror leaders....calling them insurgents.

CNN last night had on a reporter(Michael Ware) from Iraq being interviewed by Anderson Cooper....he talked of how he has met Zarqawi and how Zarqawi gets things done....I'm watching this thinking ....they are talking about a man who would kill every last American in Iraq if he was given the chance..

I hate the media.

5 posted on 06/30/2004 4:04:14 AM PDT by Dog (In Memory of Pat Tillman ---- ---- ---- American Hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

The reporting would have actually been far worse than this.

If today's media were reporting the Normandy invasion, they would have revealed that the apparent preparations to invade at Calais were a rouse and that the actual invasion would occur on the beaches of Normandy.

They would consider it a scoop and would be very proud of themselves.


6 posted on 06/30/2004 4:04:19 AM PDT by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
...they are talking about a man who would kill every last American in Iraq if he was given the chance..

But that's okay because they're the despised military.

7 posted on 06/30/2004 4:07:59 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod ('I went to Vietnam, yada yada yada, I want to be President...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Thank you for posting this. It demonstrates how the media today is more committed to the "other" side of a story.


8 posted on 06/30/2004 4:08:15 AM PDT by submarinerswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skooz; Dog
Y'all are forgetting something. In WW2, we had a Democrat president. A socialist democrat. So I'm betting there'd be about as much anti-war press as there was during the Kosovo war. Which is to say, none.
9 posted on 06/30/2004 4:10:55 AM PDT by Huck (Be nice to chubby rodents. You know, woodchucks, guinea pigs, beavers, marmots, porcupines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Huck

You're right. My bad.

BTW, we dropped quite a few bombs on Kosovo. Has anyone seen ONE picture of the devastation or a child killed by the bombs? Just one?

The way the media sanitized Monica's War is digraceful.


10 posted on 06/30/2004 4:13:51 AM PDT by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

bump


11 posted on 06/30/2004 4:17:26 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Quagmire! Wringing hands now!!


12 posted on 06/30/2004 4:26:04 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (I will never give up. So don't ask me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Yep. Today, Europe would be calling the NAZIs "freedom fighters." Hmmm...matter of fact, they are calling them just that today.


13 posted on 06/30/2004 4:35:32 AM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Two weeks ago I was watching Charles Osgood on CSPAN. He was hawking his boyhood memoir about living in Baltimore as a boy during WWII. The discussion wound its way to how the news reported the war. He talked of Murrow, Gabriel Heater,Eric Sevareid and then he said if the press had covered WWII the way it has covered Iraq "the war", and these are Osgood's words, "would have been much much tougher to win." As the 60th anniversary of D Day had just been celebrated he invited the audience to imagine how Omaha Beach and the fighting later in the Bocage would be covered and reported today. How calls for congressional investigations would be rampant.


14 posted on 06/30/2004 5:04:03 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (" You have never tasted freedom my friend, else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Huck is so right.
The entire face on this war presented to us by so called main stream media would be entirely different.
A Democrat in the White House would make this fight noble in their eyes.

Thank goodness for FOX news.


15 posted on 06/30/2004 5:13:10 AM PDT by Muscadine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftless

Normandy was a mistake. In hindsight, it was one of the dumbest things we ever did.


16 posted on 06/30/2004 5:21:30 AM PDT by nonliberal (With Specter as Judiciary Chair, how do the Bushbots propose we get a conservative onto the Court?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

bump thx


17 posted on 06/30/2004 5:32:41 AM PDT by I-spy-guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Very clever authorship.


18 posted on 06/30/2004 5:39:57 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Who's laughing? It's right on, except that they didn't include a part about innocent women and children being killed by indiscriminant shelling and bombing.


19 posted on 06/30/2004 5:49:26 AM PDT by BadAndy (Specializing in unnecessarily harsh comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: driftless

Here! Here! Well said!


20 posted on 06/30/2004 5:54:31 AM PDT by geedee (Has anyone ever seen Lurch and Jane Hathaway in the same room?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson