[churchillbuff]

I haven't seen you call for an invasion of Cuba, but that doesn't make you pro-Castro. Likewise, just because I didn't and don't think we needed to invade the impotent dirt-poor country of Iraq doesn't make me pro-Saddam. I'm with Reagan - he beat the communists without invading the Soviet Union or Eastern Europe - and a lot of those rulers were as evil as Saddam.

[Torie]

If Castro was continuing to engage in slaughtering folks in the way Saddam was, he most certainly should be taken out, effective immediately.

[jwalsh07]

It was an easy question. Why didn't you answer it?

Here I'll repeat it.

What should be American policy toward despots who give santuary to those who murder American citizens?

Give it an honest shot.

[Captiva]

I haven't seen you call for an invasion of Cuba

I wish we would. The beaches there are wonderful and the chicas are CALIENTE
(Ask this question in Miami).

[Keith]

I'm with Reagan - he beat the communists without invading the Soviet Union

Tell it to the Lebanese and Grenada...

[edchambers]

(snip)I'm with Reagan - he beat the communists without invading the Soviet Union or Eastern Europe -(snip)

We could have beat them 35-40 years earlier if we would have listened to Patton.

[Republican Wildcat]

I didn't and don't think we needed to invade the impotent dirt-poor country of Iraq doesn't make me pro-Saddam.

Yeah. All those millions they were using to bribe in the corrupt oil-for-food program were just play money from old Monopoly games.

I'm with Reagan - he beat the communists without invading the Soviet Union or Eastern Europe - and a lot of those rulers were as evil as Saddam.

Reagan invaded a number of nations...and the Soviet Union already had the nukes. Besides that, you expected Bush to invite Saddam to the White House to sign peace treaties? That's the analogy you seem to be implying.