The entire argument about sexual behavior is so simple it can be reduced to the following: Should there be any social rules about what sexual activity a human being engages in?
If the answer is no then everyone should just shut up...hetero is okay, cousins are okay, polygamy is okay, bi is okay; gay is okay, 13-year olds are okay, and one or one-hundred-at-a-time are okay, et. al.
However, if a society decides that certain rules about who does whom when and where is functional and perhaps even necessary, all that is left is to decide is WHAT are the rules of sexual behavior and WHO shall make them...simple.
Those who follow the 'rules' are then NORMAL and all the rest are PERVERTS or DEVIANTS... so very, very simple...you decide.
Van & Katherine Jenerette
www.jenerette.com
P.S. Isn’t it strange that our schools ‘protect’ our children from the likes of ‘JOE CAMEL’ because of social and health dangers in the smokers world, yet many are pushing homosexuality as a NORMAL healthy alternative lifestyle? Please look up the mortality rates of SMOKERS versus GAY MEN…
You are correct....it seems to be a debatable issue. In our constitutional form of government, we have legislators elected by the people who are to debate such serious issues and make sound decisions for the general welfare of the people.
Therefore, using the data in an article such as this to place restrictions on whom does what to whom makes perfect sense.
If they can ban smoking in bars because 2nd hand smoke MIGHT pose a threat, then how much more restrictions on known deadly viruses and bacteria.