[xrp]

Hey jerkoff, maybe you should read the thread a little closer.

Posts #46 and #78 posted similar responses as mine. That being said, I'd be all for it if the Armed Forces weren't forced to fight with a political handicap. I just went into more detail as to why I don't think the WoT is being fought as well as it could due to the politicians. The Armed Forces are doing as good a job as they can, but they could do a lot better if the politicians would let them.

[Alberta's Child]

I'm on XRP's side on this one.

You knew this was going to be a problem once they called it a "war on terror" instead of a war against specific enemies of the United States.

As soon as the phrase "war on terror" appeared in the media, you knew it wasn't going to be any more successful than those other idiotic wars against nebulous, unspecified enemies . . . "war on poverty," "war on drugs," "war on illiteracy," etc., etc.

[Howlin]

Thanks for making my case for me.

[onyx]

Stop with the "jerk-off"
That's uncalled for and rude.

[O.C. - Old Cracker]

You need to calm down, little boy. Bush isn't micro-managing like Johnson or Nixon did with Vietnam.

Calling someone a 'jerk off' betrays a lack of discipline.