Posted on 06/25/2004 11:37:33 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Good! Our word "idiot" comes from the ancient Greek word for a private person uninvolved in public affairs. The Greeks thought any free man who failed to interest himself in his own present and future was an idiot.
Let discussions in public affairs happen everywhere and revel in the discourse.
Only a coward or a fool is afraid to hear what the other side says - a coward because they are afraid they may be "turned" and a fool because they have no counter argument.
The Democrat Party is the party of "Hateriotism"
They can't compete in the talk radio arena because they have no ideas or logic. They're rely on lies, fantasy, and cut and paste.
Only a coward would allow a scumbag like Michael Moore and his propaganda to go unchallenged. A debate is based on a position one takes, based on facts.... Michael has great difficulty with facts
here = hear
Yeah!!! Cause, like, before the internet everything was OBJECTIVE. Sure. Go get some more koolaid from the "there is no bias in the "main stream" media" stand.
Bill O'Reilly??
They're going to pull out every stop on this.
It's going to be down and dirty - this is a fight to the finish.
If Moore is challened by the fact we can easily make a movie on how Bush is the oppossite of how Moore portrays him.
Not to mention "special-effects" and "groovy soundtracks." They can't get their ideas to float on their own merits, so they have to resort to grafting it on to something more appetizing, like say mass entertainment. God forbid they simply state their opinions in as boring a medium as possible, people might actually look at it critically.
Well hey, he won't drink the leftist koolaide, which in the leftist mind more then accounts for the fact that O'Reilly's views cut pretty much straight down the American center.
"God forbid they simply state their opinions in as boring a medium as possible, people might actually look at it critically."
You aren't supposed to be critical of liberal work, because it hurts their feeeeeeeelings. You are supposed to "play nice" and say only good things. They can't help it if they can't put together an honest, complete thought, cause their brains are wired all wrong.
Seems like we're making the same mistake with this film as the left made with The Passion... Giving it all kinds of free publicity.
I figure just ignore it. Let the leftists see it and squeal to each other in their little echo chamber. We only help their cause by going along with the "controversy"..
My brother moved into an apartment in Hoboken that used to belong to John Sayles.
One day, my brother got a beautiful invitation in the mail. He neglected to read the addressee before opening it (yeah right) and turns out it was from Martin Scorcese, of all people!
It was an invitation to a screening and party in Manhattan celebrating Scorcese's rerelease of the restored version of Charlton Heston and Sophia Loren's classic "El Cid."
So, after the initial brouhaha at the door over the fact that my brother and I were not John Sayles and guest, we found ourselves in a sweet little party.
My brother and I sat one row in front of, and six or seven seats to the left of Mr. Heston and Ms. Loren. You could watch them on the screen, thirty or so years younger, or you could turn around and watch them watching themselves.
Plus, we got to drink for free after the show with the stars and a bunch of celebrities like Scorsece and John Turturro and Marissa Tomei.
This is not very relevant to the thread, but it was just cool that we were at a super exclusive Charlton Heston event on that Marxist John Sayles name. It was a good time.
From the late 40s to the early 60s the real differences between the American left and right were fairly small.
As such, the press could claim objectivity while in reality it reported with a strong bias because said bias was shared through out most of America.
In the late 60s that began to change as the "New" Left took over the old anti-communist, traditionalist Left.
The press joined up with the New Left early, and changed their broadcasting bias to reflect their new ideology.
As this bias drifted ever further from the American norm, people began to notice its Leftist tint.
The press then claimed that just like those before them they were being "objective". This was partially a lie to take some of the heat off, and partially a poor understanding of history of the sort that is so endemic to the Left.
They continue to parrot this line primarily because they need to control the press. WIthout a powerful propaganda machine the Left knows it is in deep trouble in America - as Moore's comments on Americans, for example, indicates.
FATSO is laughing all the way to the bank.
I'm a bit surprised about Hollywierdos throwing a party around the movie El Cid. Spanish crusader in the Reconquest of Spain right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.