Replies

Okay. You guys are really trying my patience.

I used to read him all the time. He gets emotional and hysterical in his tone sometimes. Do you not remember the panic stricken, hysterical, hyperventilating type emotions that he was spewing out when he thought the June 30 handover meant we were pulling out all together?

He had this breathless and begging tone, saying please Mr. President, don't cut and run. Don't. Don't. Don't do it! (and it went on from there)

It was disgusting. He had it wrong. President Bush was very clear on what he meant, but he still got it all wrong.

He was wrong then, he's been wrong before and I think he's wrong now.

After the article begging the President not to cut and run, I read for a little while longer until finally I was too disgusted to read any more.

So, I don't read him any more unless I see something like this. When everyone gets all worked up over something he has written curiosity sometimes gets the better of me.

When I clicked on the article, not knowing anything but the title I saw nearly 100 posts at that time. That's usually a sure sign that he has put out more BS and people are believing it. So, I went ahead and read it this time.

You will never catch me reading his work just for my pleasure.

He never disappoints in one respect. That is, when he is all worked up over nothing, you guys are too.

Now, are you guys finished nitpicking my posts? You can't defend the article, but you are awfully interested in critiquing a lack of journalistic excellence on my part.

Are we done yet? If you have another criticism, make it quick. I'm going to bed very soon.

1. This did not originate from WND.
2. You have NOT pissed and moaned about the source that did initially cover it -- the BMJ.
3. The source documents confirm the BMJ's findings.
4. You are on record as saying that essentially, your train of thought runs along the lines of Bush can do no wrong, therefore, if Bush supports it, it can't be wrong.

Fair enough. I'd comment, though, that when you post three contradictory statements in the space of three posts you should expect questions.

So with that said, I'd submit that (if you don't like those types of questions) you shouldn't blame me for asking the obvious, but rather avoid posting in a questionable fashion.